出版科学
齣版科學
출판과학
2014年
4期
40~42
,共null页
字母词 入“典” 本质 法令 原因
字母詞 入“典” 本質 法令 原因
자모사 입“전” 본질 법령 원인
Lettered-word ;Inclusion in dictionary; Nature; Decree ;Reason
字母词入“典”的相关争论往往有非此即彼之嫌，效果不佳。本文跳出非此即彼的思维窠臼，从源头上澄清字母词本质、法令、入“典”原因三个绕不开的关键话题，以深刻理解字母词入“典”引起的相关争论，确立对待字母词的科学态度。
字母詞入“典”的相關爭論往往有非此即彼之嫌，效果不佳。本文跳齣非此即彼的思維窠臼，從源頭上澄清字母詞本質、法令、入“典”原因三箇繞不開的關鍵話題，以深刻理解字母詞入“典”引起的相關爭論，確立對待字母詞的科學態度。
자모사입“전”적상관쟁론왕왕유비차즉피지혐，효과불가。본문도출비차즉피적사유과구，종원두상징청자모사본질、법령、입“전”원인삼개요불개적관건화제，이심각리해자모사입“전”인기적상관쟁론，학립대대자모사적과학태도。
The dispute over lettered-words included in dictionaries is not that effective in general. The paper clearly clarifies such key topics at source as lettered-words＇ nature, corresponding decrees and reasons for inclusion, which is helpful to deeply understand the relevant disputes resulting from lettered-word inclusion and effectively correct the scientific attitude towards lettered-words.
