CAJ | 학술논문

基于发现法律漏洞和填补法律漏洞的不同方式，应把法律漏洞分为禁止拒绝裁判式漏洞、目的漏洞和原则漏洞三种大类。在具体操作层面，基于应然判断的逻辑形式，类推在逻辑上并非基于案件的实质相似性，而是一个先抽象反思（归纳）再演绎的过程；目的性扩张为类推的一种特殊类型；总体类推应属于目的漏洞而非原则漏洞。在漏洞确认和漏洞填补两者的关系上，目的漏洞和原则漏洞没有本质不同，即在这两者漏洞确认和漏洞填补都并非是一个完全同一的过程。运用民法不动产相邻关系中的具体例子，来具体说明法律漏洞补充的理论，从而也对物权法不动产相邻关系相关规范的具体解释适用提出了一些新的见解。
기우발현법률루동화전보법률루동적불동방식，응파법률루동분위금지거절재판식루동、목적루동화원칙루동삼충대류。재구체조작층면，기우응연판단적라집형식，유추재라집상병비기우안건적실질상사성，이시일개선추상반사（귀납）재연역적과정；목적성확장위유추적일충특수류형；총체유추응속우목적루동이비원칙루동。재루동학인화루동전보량자적관계상，목적루동화원칙루동몰유본질불동，즉재저량자루동학인화루동전보도병비시일개완전동일적과정。운용민법불동산상린관계중적구체례자，래구체설명법률루동보충적이론，종이야대물권법불동산상린관계상관규범적구체해석괄용제출료일사신적견해。
Based on the different methods for discovery and filling of loopholes in law, the loopholes in law should be classified into three main categories： loopholes due to forbiddance of judge denying, teleological loopholes and loopholes out of legal principles. At the operational level, the analogy is logically not based on substantial similarity of cases, but rather on firstly an abstractive reflective （inductive） and then a deductive process; the teleological extension shall be deemed as a special type of analogy; the mutual analogy shall be classified into teleological loopholes rather than loopholes out of legal principles. In respect to the relationship between determination of loopholes and filling of loopholes, there is no substantial difference between the cases of teleological loopholes and loopholes out of legal principles, i. e. , in both eases the determination of loopholes and filling of loopholes are not the very same process. This article uses a number of examples in the area of adjacency relationship of immovable properties to explaining the theoretical analysis of loopholes in law.