南京社会科学
南京社會科學
남경사회과학
Social Sciences in Nanjing
2014年
7期
142~146
,共null页
日本战犯 国民政府 宽大政策 日本战争罪责
日本戰犯 國民政府 寬大政策 日本戰爭罪責
일본전범 국민정부 관대정책 일본전쟁죄책
Japanese war criminals; The National Government; leniency policy; the responsi-bility for the war
战后国民政府秉持蒋介石“以德报怨”的对日处理方针,对日本战犯采取宽大政策。这一政策取向既反映了国民政府试图实现战后中日两国和解的良好意愿,又是战后若干内外现实因素影响的结果。国民政府基于自身战略利益的考虑,一方面借重投降的日军配合其接收沦陷区,另一方面为保持与美国的盟友关系而追随其对日政策,这两方面因素都直接导致其对日处置的宽大取向。在对日本战犯审判过程中,由于国民政府对日军罪行证据的调查尚不全面,从而造成引渡战犯的困难,使得中国法庭对日本战犯的审判存在一定的缺失。从整体来看,战后国民政府对日本战犯的处置在政策层面表现为宽大,而在实践层面不免失之宽纵。
戰後國民政府秉持蔣介石“以德報怨”的對日處理方針,對日本戰犯採取寬大政策。這一政策取嚮既反映瞭國民政府試圖實現戰後中日兩國和解的良好意願,又是戰後若榦內外現實因素影響的結果。國民政府基于自身戰略利益的攷慮,一方麵藉重投降的日軍配閤其接收淪陷區,另一方麵為保持與美國的盟友關繫而追隨其對日政策,這兩方麵因素都直接導緻其對日處置的寬大取嚮。在對日本戰犯審判過程中,由于國民政府對日軍罪行證據的調查尚不全麵,從而造成引渡戰犯的睏難,使得中國法庭對日本戰犯的審判存在一定的缺失。從整體來看,戰後國民政府對日本戰犯的處置在政策層麵錶現為寬大,而在實踐層麵不免失之寬縱。
전후국민정부병지장개석“이덕보원”적대일처리방침,대일본전범채취관대정책。저일정책취향기반영료국민정부시도실현전후중일량국화해적량호의원,우시전후약간내외현실인소영향적결과。국민정부기우자신전략이익적고필,일방면차중투강적일군배합기접수륜함구,령일방면위보지여미국적맹우관계이추수기대일정책,저량방면인소도직접도치기대일처치적관대취향。재대일본전범심판과정중,유우국민정부대일군죄행증거적조사상불전면,종이조성인도전범적곤난,사득중국법정대일본전범적심판존재일정적결실。종정체래간,전후국민정부대일본전범적처치재정책층면표현위관대,이재실천층면불면실지관종。
The national government took policy of leniency to Japanese war criminal with "re turn kindness for evil" treatment guidelines towards Japan from Chiang Kaishek after Word War Ⅱ. This policy not only reflected the good willing attempt by national government to create national re conciliation between China and Japan after world war Ⅱ , but also the result influenced by some in ternal and external realistic factors. Based on consideration of its own strategic interests, on the one hand the national government wanted to retake enemyoccupied area with the help of surrender Japa nese army, on the other hand the national government followed the policy toward Japan of American alliance in order to maintain the relationship between American alliances, thereby inhibiting the ex press of their aspirations. During the practice of the trials to Japanese war criminals, due to limita tions of some objective factors, the national government didn ' t investigate crime evidences of Japa nese atrocities sufficiently, and led to difficulties of extradition criminals, this made the court have some deficiencies on trials of several major cases. On the whole the performances of national govern ment about disposal of Japanese war criminals are leniency from policy level and indulgence from practice level.