CAJ | 학술논문

美学上的“进步”是一个复杂的概念。中国当代美学有的强调认识论，有的强调工具论，有的强调实践论，有的强调审美论，有的强调感性论，在此基础上形成了各自的价值取向范式，我们不能简单说哪一种理论是进步的哪一种是退步的。一种美学理论是回应时代问题的产物，也是理论历史自身逻辑发展的结果。每一种理论都有自己阐释的有效性与有限性，没有一种永远进步和简单退步的美学理论。当前认为实践存在论美学是退步的批评是对进步的滥用。
미학상적“진보”시일개복잡적개념。중국당대미학유적강조인식론，유적강조공구론，유적강조실천론，유적강조심미론，유적강조감성론，재차기출상형성료각자적개치취향범식，아문불능간단설나일충이론시진보적나일충시퇴보적。일충미학이론시회응시대문제적산물，야시이론역사자신라집발전적결과。매일충이론도유자기천석적유효성여유한성，몰유일충영원진보화간단퇴보적미학이론。당전인위실천존재론미학시퇴보적비평시대진보적람용。
The conception of“progress”is quite complicated.Among Chinese contemporary theorists of aesthetics,some prefer epistemology,some prefer Instrumentalism,some prefer practicism,some prefer aesthetics while others prefer the perceptual approach.It is difficult to say which theory is“progressive”or not because one aesthetic theory must answer the questions of its era.On the other hand,it is a natural result of the development of aesthetic history.Every theory has its own validity and limitations.There is no theory that is “progressive”forever.The current idea that the aesthetics of practice-ontology is retrogressive is an abuse of the concept of “progress”.