CAJ | 학술논문

经验知识是否具有可信赖的基础？它构成了哲学家论辩的一个基本问题域。基础主义者的回答是肯定的并集中反映在“给予论”这一理论中。但自从塞拉斯提出“给予神话”以来，哲学家开始重新审视经验知识的基础。当代一些重要的哲学家，如戴维森、麦克道威尔等都卷入其中。通过比较这些哲学家对“给予神话”不同论述可知论辩的焦点所在，即指向一个核心问题：经验内容与概念的关系。有些学者认为概念已经以不同方式进入经验内容，而反对者则认为在给予中存在非概念的经验内容作为知识的基础。对此问题的回应，最具影响的是康德的论述。通过回到康德，可进一步厘清当代经验知识基础的论战的关键所在。
경험지식시부구유가신뢰적기출？타구성료철학가론변적일개기본문제역。기출주의자적회답시긍정적병집중반영재“급여론”저일이론중。단자종새랍사제출“급여신화”이래，철학가개시중신심시경험지식적기출。당대일사중요적철학가，여대유삼、맥극도위이등도권입기중。통과비교저사철학가대“급여신화”불동논술가지론변적초점소재，즉지향일개핵심문제：경험내용여개념적관계。유사학자인위개념이경이불동방식진입경험내용，이반대자칙인위재급여중존재비개념적경험내용작위지식적기출。대차문제적회응，최구영향적시강덕적논술。통과회도강덕，가진일보전청당대경험지식기출적론전적관건소재。
It has formed a basic domain of discussion whether or not empirical knowledge has a reliable foundation. However, since Sellars presented the myth of the given, some distinguished philosophers, such as Donald Davidson, and John McDowell, have re - investigated the empirical foundation of knowledge. What they are mainly concerned is the relationship between empirical contents and conceptions. Some scholars hold that concepts permeate the em- pirical contents, but opponents claim that there are non -conceptual empirical contents in the given as the basis of knowledge. The most influential response to this is Kant＇ s expounding, which helps us understand the essence of contemporary debates about the basis of empirical knowledge.