CAJ | 학술논문

海峡两岸量刑基本原则的内容存在高度相似性，即都将罪责原则和预防原则作为量刑的基本原则。在量刑方法上，台湾地区刑法规定了以处断刑为中心的量刑方法，而大陆地区刑法则缺乏量刑方法的规定。由于海峡两岸刑法中现有的量刑方法无法解决量刑失衡的问题，两地不约而同地展开了量刑改革运动。改革之后两地在量刑方法存在明显的差异。在量刑情节的分类上，大陆地区更倾向于形式分类，而台湾地区则倾向于实质分类。在量刑情节的适用规则上，台湾地区要比大陆地区详尽，但是还是无法满足量刑精确化的要求。不过，两地开展的量刑改革都在一定程度上完善了现有的量刑情节适用规则。
해협량안양형기본원칙적내용존재고도상사성，즉도장죄책원칙화예방원칙작위양형적기본원칙。재양형방법상，태만지구형법규정료이처단형위중심적양형방법，이대륙지구형법칙결핍양형방법적규정。유우해협량안형법중현유적양형방법무법해결양형실형적문제，량지불약이동지전개료양형개혁운동。개혁지후량지재양형방법존재명현적차이。재양형정절적분류상，대륙지구경경향우형식분류，이태만지구칙경향우실질분류。재양형정절적괄용규칙상，태만지구요비대륙지구상진，단시환시무법만족양형정학화적요구。불과，량지개전적양형개혁도재일정정도상완선료현유적양형정절괄용규칙。
The contents of sentencing fundamental principle between China mainland and Taiwan are with high degree of similarity. Responsibility principle and precautionary principle are both fundamental principles of sentencing in these two regions. Taiwan criminal code prescribes awarding sentence as the key of traditional criminal sentencing method, but no clear and definite sentencing methods can be found in criminal code of China mainland. As existing sentencing methods in both of the two regions can not solve the problem of imbalance sentencing, China mainland and Taiwan coincidentally launched a sentencing reform movement. After the sentencing reforms, sentencing methods in these two regions become obviously different. The classification methods of circumstance for sentencing are also different. China mainland prefers the form classification and Taiwan prefers the substance classification. Application rules of sentencing circumstances of Taiwan is better than mainland, but still unable to meet the precise requirements of sentencing. Nevertheless, the sentencing reforms carried out in China mainland and Taiwan in some extent improve the rules for better application of sentencing circumstances.