心理学报
心理學報
심이학보
Acta Psychologica Sinica
2014年
7期
942~950
,共null页
修利超 谈诚 蒋依涵 周仁来 陈善广
脩利超 談誠 蔣依涵 週仁來 陳善廣
수리초 담성 장의함 주인래 진선엄
额区EEG偏侧化 模拟失重 头低位卧床 情绪
額區EEG偏側化 模擬失重 頭低位臥床 情緒
액구EEG편측화 모의실중 두저위와상 정서
frontal EEG asymmetry;simulated weightlessness;head-down bed rest;emotion
考察了16名22-34岁男性被试在45天-6°头低位卧床模拟失重条件下,在卧床前(第2天)、卧床期(第11,20,32,40天)及卧床后(第8天)的额区EEG偏侧化变化趋势,并采用贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)对主观情绪状态进行评估。研究发现EEG偏侧化指标呈现出明显的线性变化趋势。卧床期间个体的心境状态处于比较低的水平,报告有较强的躯体焦虑感。在整个卧床期间,个体为维持稳定的情绪状态而付出比较大的情绪调节努力。
攷察瞭16名22-34歲男性被試在45天-6°頭低位臥床模擬失重條件下,在臥床前(第2天)、臥床期(第11,20,32,40天)及臥床後(第8天)的額區EEG偏側化變化趨勢,併採用貝剋焦慮量錶(BAI)和貝剋抑鬱量錶(BDI)對主觀情緒狀態進行評估。研究髮現EEG偏側化指標呈現齣明顯的線性變化趨勢。臥床期間箇體的心境狀態處于比較低的水平,報告有較彊的軀體焦慮感。在整箇臥床期間,箇體為維持穩定的情緒狀態而付齣比較大的情緒調節努力。
고찰료16명22-34세남성피시재45천-6°두저위와상모의실중조건하,재와상전(제2천)、와상기(제11,20,32,40천)급와상후(제8천)적액구EEG편측화변화추세,병채용패극초필량표(BAI)화패극억욱량표(BDI)대주관정서상태진행평고。연구발현EEG편측화지표정현출명현적선성변화추세。와상기간개체적심경상태처우비교저적수평,보고유교강적구체초필감。재정개와상기간,개체위유지은정적정서상태이부출비교대적정서조절노력。
Suffering from the anxiety and depression under spaceflight may impair astronauts’ cognitive performance. It is difficult to investigate human emotion changes in real space environment. Previous studies suggested that the head-down bed rest (HDBR) which simulated weightlessness environment was used to evaluate emotion changes with self-reported scales and turned out to be useful tools. In addition, scientific research suggests that emotional responses are composed of initial emotional reactivity and ongoing emotion regulation. However, it is still uncertain that whether the emotion regulation competence will be impaired or not under HDBR. Therefore, we investigated the effects of 45 day-6° HDBR on participants’ self-reported anxiety and depression as well as the frontal EEG asymmetry which represents their emotion regulation competence.
Sixteen healthy non-smoking young men whose mean age was 26.33 years old (SD=4.13) were recruited in the experiment. The participants had no history of chronic or acute diseases and normal vision. They were right-handed, non-athletes and none of them were allowed to use medication, tobacco, or caffeine-containing drinks during the experiment. They should keep lying in the bed with-6 degree for 45 days. EEG data and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) as well as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were assessed and analyzed on two days before HDBR, 11th, 20th, 32nd and 40th day under HDBR together with the 8th day after HDBR respectively. According to the previous studies, we mainly measured EEG alpha asymmetry in the frontal area (FP1, FP2, F3 and F4) and the EEG was referenced on-line to the left mastoid and re-referenced off-line to the Cz electrode. Throughout the EEG recording, the impedance of the electrodes was maintained under 5 kΩ. The electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded by 40 Ag/AgCl electrodes mounted on a custom-made cap according to the extended 10-20 system and continuously sampled at 1000 Hz by a Neuroscan NuAmps amplifier. The band-pass filter range of 0.01 to 200 Hz was used during the EEG recording. The artifact-free EEG was analyzed with Discrete Fourier Transforms (DFT) which use a Hanning window of one second width and 5% overlap. Power was extracted from the 8~13 Hz frequency band and measured with mean square microvolt as its unit. The raw data of power was then transformed in the natural log (ln) in order to normalize the data distribution. The value of the frontal EEG asymmetry was calculated by subtracting the value of the left EEG power from the value of the right EEG power. Statistic analyses were performed using two-way [Time points (pre-HDBR, HDBR11, HDBR20, HDBR32, HDBR40 and post-HDBR) × electrode sites algorithm (lnFP2-lnFP1 vs. lnF4-lnF3)] repeated-measures ANOVAs with SPSS 13.0 Software. Statistically significant differences were assessed at 0.05 level and power of the effect was assessed with partial eta-squared (η^2 and the correction was done by Greenhouse-Geisser coefficient.
Frontal EEG asymmetry was clear to perform a linear increase curve (F (5, 75)=2.91, p=0.019,η^20.16) across all six time points. The main effect of electrode sites algorithm was not significant (F (1, 15)=0.03, p=0.855,η^2〈0.001), and there was no significant interaction between time points and electrode sites algorithm (F (5, 75)=0.45, p=0.813,η^20.03), either. The self-reported anxiety (F (5, 75)=2.09, p=0.076;η^20.12) and depression (F (5, 75) = 0.55, p = 0.738; η^2= 0.04) showed no significant changes before, during and after the HDBR.
These results indicate that under extreme environment, people who prefer to maintain the stability of their emotional state paid many efforts to regulate their negative emotions. Only in this way can they reported stable anxiety and depression feelings. Above all, their anxiety and depression symptoms did not fluctuate significantly under simulated weightlessness environment.