法学研究
法學研究
법학연구
Cass Journal of Law
2014年
4期
92~113
,共null页
法律原则 优先条件 优先原则 原则具体化 个案规范
法律原則 優先條件 優先原則 原則具體化 箇案規範
법률원칙 우선조건 우선원칙 원칙구체화 개안규범
legal principles, conditions of precedence, outweighed principle, concretization of principle, Regelung von Fall zu Fall
司法中针对某具体个案适用法律原则的通常情形是,没有既有规则可以适用(即“穷尽规则”),或者尽管有规则,但因其与原则相冲突而被排除适用。这两种情形的规范表现在实质上均可理解为原则之间的冲突。在相冲突的原则中确定何者最终适用于该具体个案,恰是阿列克西原则理论(尤其是其“竞争法则”)所要解决的问题。适用“竞争法则”的核心在于找寻与确立优先条件或变量,相较于阿列克西的比重公式,参照生活常情或“事物本质”能为其找寻与确立提供更为具体的实践操作路径,因为优先条件或变量的确立由此转变为找寻连接基本案件事实与优先原则的中点(此即“裁判案件要确定的核心要素”)。以“竞争法则”为理论根基,再辅之以确立优先条件或变量的具体路径,原则的规则化便水到渠成:即通过具体的优先条件或变量确立相冲突原则中优先适用的原则(即优先原则),适用优先原则的结果便是创设一个规则(即个案规范),优先条件或变量进而成为该个案规范的构成要件。个案规范才是裁判该具体个案的直接依据。
司法中針對某具體箇案適用法律原則的通常情形是,沒有既有規則可以適用(即“窮儘規則”),或者儘管有規則,但因其與原則相遲突而被排除適用。這兩種情形的規範錶現在實質上均可理解為原則之間的遲突。在相遲突的原則中確定何者最終適用于該具體箇案,恰是阿列剋西原則理論(尤其是其“競爭法則”)所要解決的問題。適用“競爭法則”的覈心在于找尋與確立優先條件或變量,相較于阿列剋西的比重公式,參照生活常情或“事物本質”能為其找尋與確立提供更為具體的實踐操作路徑,因為優先條件或變量的確立由此轉變為找尋連接基本案件事實與優先原則的中點(此即“裁判案件要確定的覈心要素”)。以“競爭法則”為理論根基,再輔之以確立優先條件或變量的具體路徑,原則的規則化便水到渠成:即通過具體的優先條件或變量確立相遲突原則中優先適用的原則(即優先原則),適用優先原則的結果便是創設一箇規則(即箇案規範),優先條件或變量進而成為該箇案規範的構成要件。箇案規範纔是裁判該具體箇案的直接依據。
사법중침대모구체개안괄용법률원칙적통상정형시,몰유기유규칙가이괄용(즉“궁진규칙”),혹자진관유규칙,단인기여원칙상충돌이피배제괄용。저량충정형적규범표현재실질상균가리해위원칙지간적충돌。재상충돌적원칙중학정하자최종괄용우해구체개안,흡시아렬극서원칙이론(우기시기“경쟁법칙”)소요해결적문제。괄용“경쟁법칙”적핵심재우조심여학립우선조건혹변량,상교우아렬극서적비중공식,삼조생활상정혹“사물본질”능위기조심여학립제공경위구체적실천조작로경,인위우선조건혹변량적학립유차전변위조심련접기본안건사실여우선원칙적중점(차즉“재판안건요학정적핵심요소”)。이“경쟁법칙”위이론근기,재보지이학립우선조건혹변량적구체로경,원칙적규칙화편수도거성:즉통과구체적우선조건혹변량학립상충돌원칙중우선괄용적원칙(즉우선원칙),괄용우선원칙적결과편시창설일개규칙(즉개안규범),우선조건혹변량진이성위해개안규범적구성요건。개안규범재시재판해구체개안적직접의거。
A court normally applies legal principles to a concrete hard case under the following two circumstances : one is that there is no applicable rule and the other is that, although there is an applicable rule, the rule cannot be applied due to its conflict with legal principles. Normatively speaking, the above two circumstances can be understood as collisions of legal principles. The question of how to determine which one among the competing principles applies to a concrete case is exactly what Robert Alexy' s principle theory, especially the law of competing principles, tries to solve. The core to the application of the law of competing nciples is to identify and establish conditions of precedence or variables. Compared with Alexy' s weight formula, common understanding of social life or the na- ture of things ( "Natur der Sache" ) can offer more concrete practical methods of identificationand es- tablishment of conditions of precedence or variables, which becomes the identification and establish- ment of the midpoint between the facts of a case and the outweighed principle applicable to the case. Thus, concretization of principle is the natural result of the application of the law of competing princi- ples and methods of identifying and establishing conditions of precedence or variables. The concrete process is to establish one outweighed principle among the competing principles on the basis of conditions of precedence or variables, and to create a rule through the application of the outweighed principle, namely, Regelung von Fall zu Fall. The conditions of precedence or variables thus become one of the constitutive requirements of the rule or Regelung yon Fall zu Fall, which constitutes the direct basis of the judgment on a concrete hard case.