CAJ | 학술논문

建立在逻辑实证基础上的调查研究，其有效性来源之一在于研究预设（议题设置、研究假设的提出和问卷及问题的设置）的有效性，而研究的主客体之间、不同的被研究者之间可能存在的文化差异性或文化特殊性，有可能消解这种预设的有效性。同时，文化差异也有可能导致被调查者对基于研究预设而形成的作为经验资料收集工具的“符码”系统（问卷及其中的问题）被解读的非标准化，进而影响到调查研究的有效性。克服文化差异这一客观障碍对调查研究的影响，可能的路径则在于让研究预设尽可能地接近被研究者的经验事实，而不是用研究者的预备想象来代替可能的经验事实。
건립재라집실증기출상적조사연구，기유효성래원지일재우연구예설（의제설치、연구가설적제출화문권급문제적설치）적유효성，이연구적주객체지간、불동적피연구자지간가능존재적문화차이성혹문화특수성，유가능소해저충예설적유효성。동시，문화차이야유가능도치피조사자대기우연구예설이형성적작위경험자료수집공구적“부마”계통（문권급기중적문제）피해독적비표준화，진이영향도조사연구적유효성。극복문화차이저일객관장애대조사연구적영향，가능적로경칙재우양연구예설진가능지접근피연구자적경험사실，이불시용연구자적예비상상래대체가능적경험사실。
Survey research is based on logical positivism , and one of its validity sources comes from ap-propriate presupposing of research , which included agenda setting , research hypotheses , and questionnaire de-signs.However, the cultural difference between the researcher and his/her interviewees will probably hamper the validity of such presupposition .Besides , the possible cultural difference may cause interviewees′misun-derstanding about the “code system”（ questionnaire and the questions in the questionnaire ） which originates from the presupposing of research and is used as a tool for data collecting .To overcome the adverse effects of cultural difference , it is important to make sure that the presupposing is based on the reality of interviewees ’ lives, rather than on researcher’s imagination.