CAJ | 학술논문

批评话语分析（Critical Discourse Analysis，简称CDA）近年来取得了最新进展，但其核心概念缺乏合理、统一的界定，影响了CDA的学科定位。本文首先综述CDA最新进展，然后重新界定CDA中的核心概念：“意识形态”、“权力”、“批评”的内涵意义以及CDA和积极话语分析（Positive Discourse Analysis，简称PDA）的关系。本研究认为：1）“意识形态”、“权力”、“批评”等核心概念的普适性和中性特点决定了CDA是一个普适性的话语分析范式；2）PDA不是对CDA的反拨或补充，CDA内在地包含了PDA；3）CDA试图通过话语分析消除社会的不平等、偏见等，效果甚微。
비평화어분석（Critical Discourse Analysis，간칭CDA）근년래취득료최신진전，단기핵심개념결핍합리、통일적계정，영향료CDA적학과정위。본문수선종술CDA최신진전，연후중신계정CDA중적핵심개념：“의식형태”、“권력”、“비평”적내함의의이급CDA화적겁화어분석（Positive Discourse Analysis，간칭PDA）적관계。본연구인위：1）“의식형태”、“권력”、“비평”등핵심개념적보괄성화중성특점결정료CDA시일개보괄성적화어분석범식；2）PDA불시대CDA적반발혹보충，CDA내재지포함료PDA；3）CDA시도통과화어분석소제사회적불평등、편견등，효과심미。
New advances have been made in Critical Discourse Analysis（CDA）. However, lack of unified definitions for its key concepts results in problems in its orientation. This paper firstly reviews the advances, then re-defines the key concepts： Ideology, Power and Critical, and the relationship between CDA and Positive Discourse Analysis （PDA）. This study argues that： 1 ） Ideology, Power and Critical are universal and neutral terms and CDA is a uni versally applicable discourse discipline; 2） PDA is not a backwash or complement to CDA. Rather, CDA inherently embodies PDA; 3 ） CDA can do little in changing inequality, discrimination, etc. in society.