CAJ | 학술논문

格语法的基本思想是：自然语言语句的底层结构以动词为中心,动词的论元由动词周围具有不同格角色的名词所担任,构成复合表达式的部分表达式分为中心成分和非中心成分.格语法的分析是多分法的语法模式.在格语法看来,有时候句中围绕同样动词的名词性成分可多可少,动词的语法功能因此改变.汉语体现了格语法的动词中心思想,产生了各式各样的格语句.动词双宾语现象和动词前和动词后的多重介词短语句皆是多分法分析的例证.汉语格语句中有不少的可选格名词,这样使得其中动词的语法功能发生变化.对格语法进行范畴语法的抽象,获得一种新型的范畴类型逻辑系统：中心成分和非中心成分的区分要求积范畴分为左积和右积;多分法的分析模式使得积范畴和函子范畴的论元是多元的,动词语法功能的改变对应函子范畴的论元增添.这种范畴类型逻辑系统的框架语义中的可及关系是非单一的,构建基于这种框架的语义模型,可以证明系统的可靠性和完全性.
격어법적기본사상시：자연어언어구적저층결구이동사위중심,동사적론원유동사주위구유불동격각색적명사소담임,구성복합표체식적부분표체식분위중심성분화비중심성분.격어법적분석시다분법적어법모식.재격어법간래,유시후구중위요동양동사적명사성성분가다가소,동사적어법공능인차개변.한어체현료격어법적동사중심사상,산생료각식각양적격어구.동사쌍빈어현상화동사전화동사후적다중개사단어구개시다분법분석적예증.한어격어구중유불소적가선격명사,저양사득기중동사적어법공능발생변화.대격어법진행범주어법적추상,획득일충신형적범주류형라집계통：중심성분화비중심성분적구분요구적범주분위좌적화우적;다분법적분석모식사득적범주화함자범주적론원시다원적,동사어법공능적개변대응함자범주적론원증첨.저충범주류형라집계통적광가어의중적가급관계시비단일적,구건기우저충광가적어의모형,가이증명계통적가고성화완전성.
The basic thought of case grammar is as follows： deep structure of natural language is verb-centered and verbs＇ arguments are bored by nouns whichpossess various case characters around them. Language expressions, accordingly, can be divided into central component and non-central component. From the perspective of case grammar which favors polychotomy, syntactic functions of verbs change with the number of nominal composition. Verb - centered thought is embedded in Chinese. It is convenient to use polychotomy to analyze phenomena of double - object sentence and sentences with mul- tiple prepositional phrases which appear before or after the verbs. Lots of nouns in Chinese which bear optional cases may change the grammatical functions of verbs. The abstraction of case grammar in the way of categorical grammar results in a new system of Categorical Type Logic （CTL） in which the division of central component and non - central component requires products to fall into the category of left product or right product. In the analytical mode of polychotomy, the argument of functor and product is plural. Change of the verb＇s grammatical function leads to the increase of argument for the category of functor. The accessibility of frame semantics in CTL is not unitary. Soundness and completeness of the system can be proved if a semantic model based on such frame can be constructed.