CAJ | 학술논문

以2002-2012年我国省域工业部门的面板数据为样本，在经典的Grossman分解模型中纳入环境规制效应，并把规模效应、结构效应、技术效应按外资企业与内资企业进行分类，然后实证分析了内外资对我国工业二氧化硫排放影响的差异。结果表明：外资给我国工业二氧化硫排放带来了正的规模效应、负的结构效应和技术效应，而内资则带来了负的规模效应、正的结构效应以及负的技术效应；与内资相比，外资仅在结构效应上占优。这在一定程度上支持了“污染避难假说”，但并不支持“污染光环假说”。
이2002-2012년아국성역공업부문적면판수거위양본，재경전적Grossman분해모형중납입배경규제효응，병파규모효응、결구효응、기술효응안외자기업여내자기업진행분류，연후실증분석료내외자대아국공업이양화류배방영향적차이。결과표명：외자급아국공업이양화류배방대래료정적규모효응、부적결구효응화기술효응，이내자칙대래료부적규모효응、정적결구효응이급부적기술효응；여내자상비，외자부재결구효응상점우。저재일정정도상지지료“오염피난가설”，단병불지지“오염광배가설”。
Using panel data of China＇s provincial industrial sector from 2002 to 2012 and incorporating environment regulation effect into the classical Grossman decomposition model, this paper analyzes the varied effect of foreign and domestic capital on industrial sulfur dioxide emissions. Scale effect, structure effect and technical effect are classified according to foreign-funded and domestic-funded enterprise types. The results show that foreign capital has a positive scale effect, negative structure effect and negative technology effect on the emissions, while domestic capital exercises a positive structure effect, negative scale effect and negative technology effect. Compared with domestic capital, foreign capital is merely superior in terms of structure effect. tion Haven Hypothesis＂ to some extent but Hypothesis＂. These findings testify to the ＂Poilu do not uphold the ＂Pollution Halo