CAJ | 학술논문

不作为犯的归责问题最早是在因果关系的名义下研究的,但对于“不作为犯的因果关系”这一命题本身来说存在不少争议。不作为犯的所谓“因果关系”实应为“条件关系”,属于客观构成要件要素,其研究目的在于为不作为犯在客观面的归责奠定基础。具体来说,这一问题需要从以实质的作为义务为核心构建的“不作为犯之实行行为”和“作为义务之欠履行与危害结果的发生”之间的条件关系以及以违反义务的关联性为判断基础的“不作为犯实行行为之危险的现实化”等三个方面来考虑,且其结论必须考虑公众的刑法认同感。
불작위범적귀책문제최조시재인과관계적명의하연구적,단대우“불작위범적인과관계”저일명제본신래설존재불소쟁의。불작위범적소위“인과관계”실응위“조건관계”,속우객관구성요건요소,기연구목적재우위불작위범재객관면적귀책전정기출。구체래설,저일문제수요종이실질적작위의무위핵심구건적“불작위범지실행행위”화“작위의무지흠리행여위해결과적발생”지간적조건관계이급이위반의무적관련성위판단기출적“불작위범실행행위지위험적현실화”등삼개방면래고필,차기결론필수고필공음적형법인동감。
The ascribing of crime of omission is regarded as its causality in the earlier time, but there are lots ot arguments on the ＂causality of crime of omission＂. Therefore, the ＂causality of crime of omission＂ should be referred to as ＂conditional relationship of crime of omission＂, which is part of objective elements, whose purpose is laying a foundation for ascribing of crime omission on the objective aspect. Specifically, ascribing of crime of omission needs to be judged in the followingthree aspects：＂perpetrating act in crime of omission＂ built on the core of legal duty to act, the conditional relationship between ＂non - implementation of legal duty to act and the occurrence of harmful results＂ ,and ＂realization of danger in perpetrating act in crime of omission＂ judged on the basis of the relevance in violation of legal duty, and its conclusion must consider the public identity of criminal law.