体育学刊
體育學刊
체육학간
Journal of Physical Education
2014年
5期
118~123
,共null页
竞赛与训练 男篮比赛 技术统计 奥运会
競賽與訓練 男籃比賽 技術統計 奧運會
경새여훈련 남람비새 기술통계 오운회
competition and training;men’s basketball game;technical statistic;Olympic Games
通过对奥运会男篮比赛在不同节奏下获胜球队和失败球队的数据对比以及不同节奏下技术统计指标的差异分析,探索影响篮球比赛节奏的技术因素及影响比赛胜负的因素;通过中国队与对手的比较,寻找中国队在历届奥运会存在的问题,为今后的训练和比赛提供参考依据。研究结果显示:在较快节奏下胜队更能发挥出实力优势,表现出较高的绩效;在较慢的节奏中弱队能够减少与强队技术统计数据上的差距。2分投、抢断、2分中、失误决定着控球权次数,影响着比赛节奏的快慢。中国队在快节奏比赛中综合表现很差;一般节奏下2分球命中率较低,3分投篮出手机会较少,助攻较少,失误较多;在慢节奏下中国队才能正常发挥自己的水平,胜率较高。
通過對奧運會男籃比賽在不同節奏下穫勝毬隊和失敗毬隊的數據對比以及不同節奏下技術統計指標的差異分析,探索影響籃毬比賽節奏的技術因素及影響比賽勝負的因素;通過中國隊與對手的比較,尋找中國隊在歷屆奧運會存在的問題,為今後的訓練和比賽提供參攷依據。研究結果顯示:在較快節奏下勝隊更能髮揮齣實力優勢,錶現齣較高的績效;在較慢的節奏中弱隊能夠減少與彊隊技術統計數據上的差距。2分投、搶斷、2分中、失誤決定著控毬權次數,影響著比賽節奏的快慢。中國隊在快節奏比賽中綜閤錶現很差;一般節奏下2分毬命中率較低,3分投籃齣手機會較少,助攻較少,失誤較多;在慢節奏下中國隊纔能正常髮揮自己的水平,勝率較高。
통과대오운회남람비새재불동절주하획성구대화실패구대적수거대비이급불동절주하기술통계지표적차이분석,탐색영향람구비새절주적기술인소급영향비새성부적인소;통과중국대여대수적비교,심조중국대재력계오운회존재적문제,위금후적훈련화비새제공삼고의거。연구결과현시:재교쾌절주하성대경능발휘출실력우세,표현출교고적적효;재교만적절주중약대능구감소여강대기술통계수거상적차거。2분투、창단、2분중、실오결정착공구권차수,영향착비새절주적쾌만。중국대재쾌절주비새중종합표현흔차;일반절주하2분구명중솔교저,3분투람출수궤회교소,조공교소,실오교다;재만절주하중국대재능정상발휘자기적수평,성솔교고。
By comparing the data of winning and losing teams in Olympic men’s basketball games played at different paces, and by analyzing technical statistic differences between the games played at different paces, the author probed into basketball game pace affecting technical factors and game outcome affecting factors; by comparing team China with its opponents, the author sought for problems which team China had in all previous Olympic Games, so as to provide a refer-ence criterion for training and competition henceforward. The author revealed the following findings: at a faster pace, the winning teams were more capable of exerting their strength advantage, showing higher performance; at a slower pace, the weak teams could reduce their differences form the strong teams in terms of technical statistic data; two-point shots, steals, two-point winners and turnovers determined the number of ball possessions, affected the pace of a game; in fast pace games, team China had very poor comprehensive performance; at an ordinary pace, team China had a low two-point win-ner rate, few three-point shooting opportunities, few assists, quite a number of turnovers; only at a slow pace could team China perform normally and have a higher winning rate.