CAJ | 학술논문

选择一种可操作的案例研究模式已经成为研究者进行科学研究的基本工作。基于方法论视角，根据对现有文献的梳理，本研究发现现有的案例研究模式分类缺乏综合考虑研究者的主观需要、客观条件、实证研究逻辑及其技术路线等因素。针对这一问题，本研究首先探讨了当前案例研究分类存在的合理性与必要性。其次，分析了研究者的主观需要与客观条件以及实证研究逻辑给现有案例研究分类带来的冲击。最后，基于方法论的功能主义视角，将案例研究划分为基础理论建构模式、理论确证模式、理论建构与确证相结合的混合模式三种，以供案例研究者参考。
선택일충가조작적안례연구모식이경성위연구자진행과학연구적기본공작。기우방법론시각，근거대현유문헌적소리，본연구발현현유적안례연구모식분류결핍종합고필연구자적주관수요、객관조건、실증연구라집급기기술로선등인소。침대저일문제，본연구수선탐토료당전안례연구분류존재적합이성여필요성。기차，분석료연구자적주관수요여객관조건이급실증연구라집급현유안례연구분류대래적충격。최후，기우방법론적공능주의시각，장안례연구화분위기출이론건구모식、이론학증모식、이론건구여학증상결합적혼합모식삼충，이공안례연구자삼고。
Choosing a workable case study mode has become a basic work for scientific researchers. Based on the methodology perspective and the combing of existing literature, this study found that the existing mode classification lacks comprehensive consideration on researcher＇s subjective requirement, objective conditions, the empirical study logic and its technology roadmap and other factors. To solve this problem, this study first explored the reasonableness and necessity of the existence of the current classification of case study. Secondly, it analyzed the impact on the existing case study classification from the subjective requirement, the objective conditions, and the empirical study logic. Finally, based on methodological functionalism perspective, the study divided case study into three types that are basic theoretical construction mode, theoretical confirmation mode, the mix mode of theoretical construction and confirmation, which could be used for the reference of case re searchers.