CAJ | 학술논문

理性是实践的基础，它在政治、行政领域表现为各种组织和制度。协商的产生和广泛应用源于从实践理性到交往理性、选择理性到有限理性的两种修正，从这两种修正中可以得出认识协商有效性的程序与结果两个维度。基于这两个维度，我国的协商实践可以分为决策型协商、解压型协商、告示型协商、谏言型协商四类。在统一框架内把握每类协商的特征和问题，是增强协商有效性的前提。
이성시실천적기출，타재정치、행정영역표현위각충조직화제도。협상적산생화엄범응용원우종실천이성도교왕이성、선택이성도유한이성적량충수정，종저량충수정중가이득출인식협상유효성적정서여결과량개유도。기우저량개유도，아국적협상실천가이분위결책형협상、해압형협상、고시형협상、간언형협상사류。재통일광가내파악매류협상적특정화문제，시증강협상유효성적전제。
Rationality is the basis of practice. In political and administrative areas, rationality,usually in organizational and institutional forms, plays an important role. The amending from practicalrationality to communicative rationality and selective rationality to bounded rationality lead to thegeneration and widely use of deliberative democracy. From the amending of rationality, we can draw outtwo dimensions, procedure and result, to analyze effectiveness of deliberative democracy. Based on thesetwo dimensions, we can divide deliberative democracy practices into four types, namely, deliberation fordecision-making, deliberation for pressure-releasing, deliberation for notifying and deliberation forexpostulating. A comprehensive understanding of different deliberation practices in a unified framework isthe prerequisite to enhance the effectiveness of deliberative democracy.