CAJ | 학술논문

“达特茅斯学院案”是美国高等教育史上较为重大的事件，国内学者已对此事件进行了一定的研究。从已有的研究成果来看，国内学者对该案的认识和评价还存在某些误区。通过对“达特茅斯学院案”的过程进行重新梳理可以发现，该案是一场包括达特茅斯学院、新罕布什尔州政府和议会在内的多方利益的角逐，该案的历史意义并非是对“公立”和“私立”高等教育机构的区分，而是为私人财产提供法律保护，由此促进了私立学院在一定时期的快速发展。我们对“达特茅斯学院案”的历史贡献，应予以实事求是的评价。
“체특모사학원안”시미국고등교육사상교위중대적사건，국내학자이대차사건진행료일정적연구。종이유적연구성과래간，국내학자대해안적인식화평개환존재모사오구。통과대“체특모사학원안”적과정진행중신소리가이발현，해안시일장포괄체특모사학원、신한포십이주정부화의회재내적다방이익적각축，해안적역사의의병비시대“공립”화“사립”고등교육궤구적구분，이시위사인재산제공법률보호，유차촉진료사립학원재일정시기적쾌속발전。아문대“체특모사학원안”적역사공헌，응여이실사구시적평개。
The Dartmouth Case is a significant event in the history of American higher education, on which the domestic researchers have done some studies. However, according to the existed achievements, there are some misunderstandings for domestic researches. By re-describing the historical process of the Dartmouth Case, and then re-analyzing the characteristics and significance of this case on a more adequate basis of relevant historical documents and foreigner researches, we can find that this case is a kind of rival among Dartmouth College, the New Hampshire State Government and Legislature in many ways. The historical significance of this case is not the differentiation of ＂public＂ and ＂private＂ higher education, but the protection of private property and the promotion of the development of private colleges in a specific period. The historical significance of Dartmouth Case should be evaluated in a realistic and pragmatic approach.