CAJ | 학술논문

公共利益在现代社会不断丰富和扩大,与人们的生产、生活联系越来越密切,公共利益的维护成为时代最迫切的需要。然而当代中国的现行立法恰恰回避了公共利益的界定,导致公共利益保护犹如镜花水月。实体法上的缺陷仅是公共利益保护的瑕疵,毕竟大量的立法已经将公共利益纳入了法律保护的视域,公共利益没有获得现行诉讼救济机制充分保护才是立法的重大制度性缺陷。对我国三大诉讼机制在公共利益保护上的具体分析,提出未来立法的完善建议,就是要让公共利益不再失落于现代的诉讼文明之中。
공공이익재현대사회불단봉부화확대,여인문적생산、생활련계월래월밀절,공공이익적유호성위시대최박절적수요。연이당대중국적현행입법흡흡회피료공공이익적계정,도치공공이익보호유여경화수월。실체법상적결함부시공공이익보호적하자,필경대량적입법이경장공공이익납입료법률보호적시역,공공이익몰유획득현행소송구제궤제충분보호재시입법적중대제도성결함。대아국삼대소송궤제재공공이익보호상적구체분석,제출미래입법적완선건의,취시요양공공이익불재실락우현대적소송문명지중。
Public benefits is increasing and expanding continuously in modem society, which leads to a closer relationship be- tween public benefits and people＇s production and life, so the preservation of public benefits becomes necessary for this time. But it is hard for theorists to define whether public benefits should be included in the territory of litigation remedy. The law in force in modern China avoids the definition of public benefits, which does cause the nihility of the protection of public benefits. Defects of substantive law are only flaws in public benefits protection, after all, public benefits are already included in the view of legal protection by a lot of legislations, but the serious systematic defect in legislation is actually the exclusion of public benefits from active litigation remedy mechanism. Therefore, the detailed analysis of public benefits protection of the three kinds of litigation mechanisms and the suggestion of the perfection of future legislation, are to avoid the vanishing of public benefits from the modem litigation civilization.