CAJ | 학술논문

中国古代的抑兼并思想本质上是经济学整体主义方法论的产物，它在不同历史条件下所起的经济社会作用有所差异，但总体上不利于市场经济自发的长期的扩展。作为其对立面，反对抑兼并的思想包含个人主义方法论的因素，有可能孕育出顺应市场经济发展的制度安排，但由于种种原因，这种可能没有变成现实。这一案例提示我们，在社会经济已经发展到要素自由流动达一定水平的情况下，既保持这种能促进资源配置优化的效率机制，又能够实现以起点和过程公平为核心的社会正义，需要对个人主义经济学方法论的加深理解和逐步兼容，推进常态下整体主义方法论向个人主义方法论的观念转型。
중국고대적억겸병사상본질상시경제학정체주의방법론적산물，타재불동역사조건하소기적경제사회작용유소차이，단총체상불리우시장경제자발적장기적확전。작위기대립면，반대억겸병적사상포함개인주의방법론적인소，유가능잉육출순응시장경제발전적제도안배，단유우충충원인，저충가능몰유변성현실。저일안례제시아문，재사회경제이경발전도요소자유류동체일정수평적정황하，기보지저충능촉진자원배치우화적효솔궤제，우능구실현이기점화과정공평위핵심적사회정의，수요대개인주의경제학방법론적가심리해화축보겸용，추진상태하정체주의방법론향개인주의방법론적관념전형。
Thought for checking annex in ancient China was a product of economics holism methodology. There were some differences of historical influence due to specific social conditions. But on the whole it was not conducive to development of market economy. As its opposition, thought about fighting against to check annex contained some factors of economies individualism methodology and had possibility to promote market economy. Although it was not become to reality in ancient China this case shows that when the social economy reached a certain level of market it is necessary to transform from economics holism methodology to individualism methodology on ideas.