CAJ | 학술논문

17世纪的多恩研究,围绕“才”和“象”这对核心观念,经历了品评、颂扬、反思三个阶段。反思预示着20世纪的理论争鸣,而品评和赞扬则揭示了人们对16世纪末那种典雅、细腻、优美、极富乐感的抒情诗传统的摈弃。17世纪的研究尽管有着强烈的品评性质,但分析较为肤浅,反思也不系统,却反映了当时的英国诗坛的基本走向和一般状况,特别是琼生、卡洛、德莱顿等人的评价,更对后来三百多年的多恩研究产生了重大而深远的影响。即便在今天,有关多恩研究的选题依据、分析方法和基本走向,连同多恩诗的类别划分和核心概念,都可见到17世纪的影子,甚至研究重点、研究空白、争论焦点、审美关照等,都显示出对17世纪的多恩研究的一种回应、继承与发展。
17세기적다은연구,위요“재”화“상”저대핵심관념,경력료품평、송양、반사삼개계단。반사예시착20세기적이론쟁명,이품평화찬양칙게시료인문대16세기말나충전아、세니、우미、겁부악감적서정시전통적빈기。17세기적연구진관유착강렬적품평성질,단분석교위부천,반사야불계통,각반영료당시적영국시단적기본주향화일반상황,특별시경생、잡락、덕래돈등인적평개,경대후래삼백다년적다은연구산생료중대이심원적영향。즉편재금천,유관다은연구적선제의거、분석방법화기본주향,련동다은시적유별화분화핵심개념,도가견도17세기적영자,심지연구중점、연구공백、쟁론초점、심미관조등,도현시출대17세기적다은연구적일충회응、계승여발전。
In the 17th century, John Donne studies witnessed a concentrated discussion of his wit and conceit as well as a marked progress from personal appreciation via lavish admiration to critical assessment. While the last proves a harbinger of theoretical disputes in the 20th century, the first two reveal a turn against the lyrical tradition that, by the end of the 16th century, had become extremely gentle, graceful, refined and full of music. Inadequate, shallow and fragmental as they were, the achievements in the 17th century somehow mirrored the basic trend and milieu of that era. Particular significance went to Ben Jonson, Thomas Carew, and John Dryden, whose originality and insights were to exercise a profound influence on Donne studies throughout the centuries to come. Current studies of Donne, including the focus in subject matter, analytical approaches, general trends, classification of Donne＇s poems, and key terms of speculation, are, to a great extant, a continuation and a testimony of the tradition already established in the 17th century. Even academic emphasis, research vacancies, theoretical controversies and aesthetic acceptance are largely identical, though with many differences.