CAJ | 학술논문

对传统安全研究的批评早在冷战后期的20世纪80年代渐成规模。欧洲与美国学者在讨论传统安全概念弊端的初期各有建树，但至90年代末期，大西洋两岸安全研究的分野越来越明显。批判的安全研究在欧洲的发展远比美国强劲有力，并极大地改变了欧洲安全研究的面貌，美欧在安全研究的本体论以及纲领研究上变得大不相同。欧洲形成了重塑安全研究的三大中心，即丹麦的哥本哈根、法国的巴黎与英国的阿伯里斯特维斯。以三大分支流派为主干的欧洲批判安全研究，构成了在一个美国人长期把持的领域内颇具欧洲特性的安全理论群。
대전통안전연구적비평조재랭전후기적20세기80년대점성규모。구주여미국학자재토론전통안전개념폐단적초기각유건수，단지90년대말기，대서양량안안전연구적분야월래월명현。비판적안전연구재구주적발전원비미국강경유력，병겁대지개변료구주안전연구적면모，미구재안전연구적본체론이급강령연구상변득대불상동。구주형성료중소안전연구적삼대중심，즉단맥적가본합근、법국적파려여영국적아백리사특유사。이삼대분지류파위주간적구주비판안전연구，구성료재일개미국인장기파지적영역내파구구주특성적안전이론군。
The criticism upon traditional security study was greatly increased in 1980s when the Cold War was coming to its later period. Scholars from both sides of the Atlantic participated in the debate, making their contributions to redefining security. However by the end of 1990s, the split in security study across the Atlantic has become obvious. Critical approaches to security study in Europe were de- veloping more vigorously, which largely reshaped the security study in Europe, and differentiated this subfield of IR in European from that of the US in terms of ontology and research agenda program. Copenhagen, Paris and Aberystwyth are the three maior locations and branches of European critical security studies. They manifest the Europeanness and constitute the key components of Europe- an school of security theory in an American field.