CAJ | 학술논문

从儒家“知”的概念入手，可将其“知”论解读为一种“力行”知识论。儒家区分了两类不同性质的认识，即“闻见之知”与“德性之知”，后者在儒家看来才是真正的知识。德性之知是以“诚”为立足点的，其目标是“穷理”。“知行合一”说最能体现这种“知”论的特性。中国传统哲学并非不存在知识论，它只是未曾产生出“知道如是”的知识论，而发展出了一种另一类型的、“知道如何”的知识论。中国的“力行”知识论与赖尔所论述的“知道如何”的知识论相比，既有相同之处，同时又具有自己的特点。相同之处主要在于，它们都与“日常生活”中人们的能力与行动有关，都属于实践知识论的范畴，都主张规则的规范作用；不同之处在于，赖尔的“知道如何”是以“行”蕴“知”，而儒家的“力行”知识论则是以知为行的理由、根据，等等。
종유가“지”적개념입수，가장기“지”론해독위일충“역행”지식론。유가구분료량류불동성질적인식，즉“문견지지”여“덕성지지”，후자재유가간래재시진정적지식。덕성지지시이“성”위립족점적，기목표시“궁리”。“지행합일”설최능체현저충“지”론적특성。중국전통철학병비불존재지식론，타지시미증산생출“지도여시”적지식론，이발전출료일충령일류형적、“지도여하”적지식론。중국적“역행”지식론여뢰이소논술적“지도여하”적지식론상비，기유상동지처，동시우구유자기적특점。상동지처주요재우，타문도여“일상생활”중인문적능력여행동유관，도속우실천지식론적범주，도주장규칙적규범작용；불동지처재우，뢰이적“지도여하”시이“행”온“지”，이유가적“역행”지식론칙시이지위행적이유、근거，등등。
Beginning with Confucian concept of “knowledge”, the paper interprets its theory as the “practice epistemology”. For Confucianism, it distinguished two kinds of knowledge, i.e. “knowledge coming from seeing and hearing”and “knowledge obtained through one＇s virtues”, and took the latter as the real knowledge. “Knowledge obtained through one＇s virtues”is based on the concept of “sincerity”, its goal is to “explore principles” completely. The doctrine of the “identity of knowledge and action” can give a full expression of the characters of Confucian theory of knowledge. It can＇t said that there was no epistemology in traditional Chinese philosophy. What can be said is that although there was no epistemology in the sense of “knowledge-that”, traditional Chinese philosophy has developed other type of epistemology, i.e. that of “knowledge-how”. Compared with Ryle＇s “knowledge-how”, Chinese practice epistemology has similarities with it, and in the meantime Chinese practice epistemology has its own characteristics.