CAJ | 학술논문

法律论证面向现实生活，需要具备严格的逻辑语言和规范的思维导向，因而无论是基础主义还是融贯论都对法律论证具有关键作用。从论辩规划的整体性来考量，融贯论能够为思维和言说提供一种秩序层面上的评断标准。规范性融贯不同于叙述性融贯和规范的一致性问题。规范体系、理念、构成，乃至价值期待的融贯为表面上及其复杂的制度系统提供了一种“秩序”，从而有助于实现论证前提在规范层面上的明确性、清晰性，论证进程在逻辑体系上的连贯性、融洽性，论证结论在效力保障上的说服力。法律论证中的规范性融贯作为一种理论层面的标准，离不开语用学依托实践对言说实践进行考察的思维和进路。
법률론증면향현실생활，수요구비엄격적라집어언화규범적사유도향，인이무론시기출주의환시융관론도대법률론증구유관건작용。종론변규화적정체성래고량，융관론능구위사유화언설제공일충질서층면상적평단표준。규범성융관불동우서술성융관화규범적일치성문제。규범체계、이념、구성，내지개치기대적융관위표면상급기복잡적제도계통제공료일충“질서”，종이유조우실현론증전제재규범층면상적명학성、청석성，론증진정재라집체계상적련관성、융흡성，론증결론재효력보장상적설복력。법률론증중적규범성융관작위일충이론층면적표준，리불개어용학의탁실천대언설실천진행고찰적사유화진로。
Legal argument confronts real life, requiring strict logical language and normative oriented thinking, therefore both foundationalism and coherence are critical for legal argument. From the consideration of integrality of argument programme, coherence theory could provide an judging criteria on level of order for thinking and discourse. The normative coherence is quite different from narrative coherence and normative consistency. The coherence of normative system, ideas, constitution and value expectation has provided an order for the complicated normative system, thus would contribute to the definition and clarity of premises on the normative level, to the consistency and harmony on logical system of argumentation, also to the persuasion of conclusion on the level of guarantee of effectiveness. As an theoretical standard, normative coherence of legal argument cannot do without pragmatics which explores the practical discourse.