远程教育杂志
遠程教育雜誌
원정교육잡지
Distance Education Journal
2014年
6期
49~55
,共null页
钱冬明 孙梦 庄俭 杨平 余平
錢鼕明 孫夢 莊儉 楊平 餘平
전동명 손몽 장검 양평 여평
社区教育网站 评价指标模型 定性评价 定量评价 数据获取
社區教育網站 評價指標模型 定性評價 定量評價 數據穫取
사구교육망참 평개지표모형 정성평개 정량평개 수거획취
Community educational websites;Evaluation index model;Qualitative evaluation;Quantitative evaluation;Data ac-quisition
社区教育网站是构筑终身教育体系和学习型社会的载体，同时也是实现信息化社区的先导。近年来在全国范围内，社区教育网站的数量不断拓展，但由于缺乏相应的科学评价标准及规范，各网站的建设质量参差不齐。因此，有必要建立有效的评价体系，通过评价促进社区教育网站的有序优质建设。在对网站评价指标内容、评价模式和评价指标体系设计思路的研究现状进行分析的基础上，结合对上海市部分区县网站及管理人员进行的实地调研结果，设计了社区教育网站评价指标体系的指标模型。依据以内容为核心、针对性、综合性三个设计原则，评价指标模型包括5个一级指标和21个二级指标，从信息内容、教学特性、网站设计、技术水平、网站效益等角度对网站进行评价。针对对各个指标数据的获取方式进行的初步设计，也为评价指标体系的实际应用奠定了基础。
社區教育網站是構築終身教育體繫和學習型社會的載體，同時也是實現信息化社區的先導。近年來在全國範圍內，社區教育網站的數量不斷拓展，但由于缺乏相應的科學評價標準及規範，各網站的建設質量參差不齊。因此，有必要建立有效的評價體繫，通過評價促進社區教育網站的有序優質建設。在對網站評價指標內容、評價模式和評價指標體繫設計思路的研究現狀進行分析的基礎上，結閤對上海市部分區縣網站及管理人員進行的實地調研結果，設計瞭社區教育網站評價指標體繫的指標模型。依據以內容為覈心、針對性、綜閤性三箇設計原則，評價指標模型包括5箇一級指標和21箇二級指標，從信息內容、教學特性、網站設計、技術水平、網站效益等角度對網站進行評價。針對對各箇指標數據的穫取方式進行的初步設計，也為評價指標體繫的實際應用奠定瞭基礎。
사구교육망참시구축종신교육체계화학습형사회적재체，동시야시실현신식화사구적선도。근년래재전국범위내，사구교육망참적수량불단탁전，단유우결핍상응적과학평개표준급규범，각망참적건설질량삼차불제。인차，유필요건립유효적평개체계，통과평개촉진사구교육망참적유서우질건설。재대망참평개지표내용、평개모식화평개지표체계설계사로적연구현상진행분석적기출상，결합대상해시부분구현망참급관리인원진행적실지조연결과，설계료사구교육망참평개지표체계적지표모형。의거이내용위핵심、침대성、종합성삼개설계원칙，평개지표모형포괄5개일급지표화21개이급지표，종신식내용、교학특성、망참설계、기술수평、망참효익등각도대망참진행평개。침대대각개지표수거적획취방식진행적초보설계，야위평개지표체계적실제응용전정료기출。
Community educational websites are the vehicles to build a lifelong education system and learning community, as well as the preludes to the informationization of community. In recent years, community educational websites have been rapidly devel-oping in China. However, due to the lack of appropriate evaluation criteria and evaluation principles, the websites are rather spotty. A lot of websites have problems such as lack of targeted contents and interaction. As a result, it is of great importance to set up an ef-fective evaluation system, through which these kinds of websites are measured, so that better ways can be found to build the high-quality sites. Through a literature review conducted in terms of evaluation index, evaluation modes and design procedure, and with the results of investigating some of the community educational websites in Shanghai, and interviewing some managers of these websites, the evaluation model was designed on the principles of its contents, target and comprehensiveness. There are five first-class indexes and twenty-one second-class indexes in the model, with the first-class indexes including information and content, instructional fea-tures, design, technology and achievement. In addition, the way of acquiring the evaluation data is displayed, laying the foundation for the practice of the evaluation criteria.
