CAJ | 학술논문

李泽厚与杨国荣以对话的形式,对社会性道德与宗教性道德之分、伦理与道德的涵义、权利与善、经验与先验、历史与理性、心理与本体的关系,以及如何理解“转识成智”中的“智”等问题,作了理论上的讨论.杨国荣认为宗教性道德中蕴含着个体性的人生取向,这种取向不能完全等同于道德,由此,他更趋向于考察道德与政治、法律的关系及两者的相互制约,李泽厚则坚持社会性道德与宗教性道德之分.对伦理与道德,杨国荣关注两者的共同内涵,李泽厚则突出两者的区分.关于权利与善,杨国荣主张区分以一般价值原则等形式呈现的形式层面的“善”与表现为对人的合理需要满足的实质层面的“善”,由此侧重于权利与善之间的互动,李泽厚则强调权利优先于善.李泽厚提出“经验变先验”、“历史建理性”、“心理成本体”三个著名命题,杨国荣在充分肯定以上命题的重要理论意义的同时,主张以“先验返经验”、“理性渗历史”、“本体存心理”来延伸和扩展以上命题.对李泽厚提出的“金冯学派”传统与“转识成智”中“智”的涵义等问题,杨国荣作了简要回应.
리택후여양국영이대화적형식,대사회성도덕여종교성도덕지분、윤리여도덕적함의、권리여선、경험여선험、역사여이성、심리여본체적관계,이급여하리해“전식성지”중적“지”등문제,작료이론상적토론.양국영인위종교성도덕중온함착개체성적인생취향,저충취향불능완전등동우도덕,유차,타경추향우고찰도덕여정치、법률적관계급량자적상호제약,리택후칙견지사회성도덕여종교성도덕지분.대윤리여도덕,양국영관주량자적공동내함,리택후칙돌출량자적구분.관우권리여선,양국영주장구분이일반개치원칙등형식정현적형식층면적“선”여표현위대인적합리수요만족적실질층면적“선”,유차측중우권리여선지간적호동,리택후칙강조권리우선우선.리택후제출“경험변선험”、“역사건이성”、“심리성본체”삼개저명명제,양국영재충분긍정이상명제적중요이론의의적동시,주장이“선험반경험”、“이성삼역사”、“본체존심리”래연신화확전이상명제.대리택후제출적“금풍학파”전통여“전식성지”중“지”적함의등문제,양국영작료간요회응.
In the form of dialogue, this article discusses the various ethical issues, including the division of social morality and religious morality, the connotation of ethics and morality, the relation between rights and goodness, experience and the transcendental, history and reason, psychology and mental substance, and the meaning of wisdom. Li Zehou maintains the division of social morality and religious morality while Yang Guorong disagrees to this division. Li Zehou claims the priority of rights over goodness while Yang Guorong focuses on the interaction of the two. To Li Zehou＇s three philosophical propositions regarding the relation experience and the transcendental, history and reason, psychology and mental substance, Yang Guorong tries to extend them by relevant propositions.