武汉体育学院学报
武漢體育學院學報
무한체육학원학보
Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education
2014年
9期
29~33
,共null页
陈林华 曾理 王跃 李荣日
陳林華 曾理 王躍 李榮日
진림화 증리 왕약 리영일
体育城市 指标体系 因子分析法 一线城市
體育城市 指標體繫 因子分析法 一線城市
체육성시 지표체계 인자분석법 일선성시
sports city; index system; factor analysis; first-tier city
近年来我国诸多城市提出建设国际体育城市并付诸实践,学术界也展开了相应的理论研究.在前期研究的基础上,利用因子分析法对国际体育城市指标体系进行了验证,构建了涵盖城市体育影响力、体育规划及设施、动态金融、体育产业活力、生活质量、经济总规模等6个纬度及23个具体指标的国际体育城市评价体系,并以我国35个大中城市为例通过量化公式计算出国际体育城市发展指数.结果表明,我国城市体育发展极不平衡,北京、上海城市体育国际化竞争力略高于广州、南京、深圳和天津,6城市已经具备一定的基础优势,但是整体国际竞争力与国际著名体育城市相比还存在差距,城市体育产业发展并不具备国际竞争力,缺乏与国际信息沟通的渠道和话语权.
近年來我國諸多城市提齣建設國際體育城市併付諸實踐,學術界也展開瞭相應的理論研究.在前期研究的基礎上,利用因子分析法對國際體育城市指標體繫進行瞭驗證,構建瞭涵蓋城市體育影響力、體育規劃及設施、動態金融、體育產業活力、生活質量、經濟總規模等6箇緯度及23箇具體指標的國際體育城市評價體繫,併以我國35箇大中城市為例通過量化公式計算齣國際體育城市髮展指數.結果錶明,我國城市體育髮展極不平衡,北京、上海城市體育國際化競爭力略高于廣州、南京、深圳和天津,6城市已經具備一定的基礎優勢,但是整體國際競爭力與國際著名體育城市相比還存在差距,城市體育產業髮展併不具備國際競爭力,缺乏與國際信息溝通的渠道和話語權.
근년래아국제다성시제출건설국제체육성시병부제실천,학술계야전개료상응적이론연구.재전기연구적기출상,이용인자분석법대국제체육성시지표체계진행료험증,구건료함개성시체육영향력、체육규화급설시、동태금융、체육산업활력、생활질량、경제총규모등6개위도급23개구체지표적국제체육성시평개체계,병이아국35개대중성시위례통과양화공식계산출국제체육성시발전지수.결과표명,아국성시체육발전겁불평형,북경、상해성시체육국제화경쟁력략고우엄주、남경、심수화천진,6성시이경구비일정적기출우세,단시정체국제경쟁력여국제저명체육성시상비환존재차거,성시체육산업발전병불구비국제경쟁력,결핍여국제신식구통적거도화화어권.
In recent years, many Chinese cities have proposed the plans to become global sports cities and put them into practice. In the academic circles, related theoretical researches have been launched. In this paper, the evaluation index system of global sports city was verified by factor analysis method. The system was consisted of six two level indicators and thirty four specific indicators, such as sports influence, planning and facilities, dynamic financial, sports industry vi- tality, quality of life and the total economic scale. The development index was calculated by taking the 35 large and medi- um- sized cities in China as the example. The results showed that the development of China's sports city was not extreme- ly imbalanced, and the international competitiveness of Beijing and Shanghai was slightly higher than that of Guangzhou, Nanjing, Shenzhen and Tianjin. These cities had some advantages, but their overall international competitiveness was in- ferior to that of the other international famous sports cities. The development of sports industry in these cities was not a- ble to compete internationally. These cities were in lack of international discourse right and information.