系统工程理论与实践
繫統工程理論與實踐
계통공정이론여실천
Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice
2014年
9期
2283~2294
,共null页
环境因素 统计噪声 四阶段SFA 动态管理效率 政府管理绩效
環境因素 統計譟聲 四階段SFA 動態管理效率 政府管理績效
배경인소 통계조성 사계단SFA 동태관리효솔 정부관리적효
environmental factors;statistical noise;four-stage SFA;dynamic management efficiency;government performance
为克服三阶段DEA模型忽略了投入-产出之间统计噪声对技术效率的影响这一不足,将环境因素细分为员工工作环境和管理环境两类,提出了一种基于随机前沿分析(stochastic frontier analysis)技术的四阶段模型.通过对比剔除管理环境因素前后的技术效率,得到动态经营管理效率(management efficiency).进一步,利用四阶段SFA模型对2002-2010年间我国省际技术效率和政府管理绩效进行了测算.研究发现:(1)我国整体、三大地区及各省区综合技术效率均呈现"U型"波动趋势,且东部地区最高,中部次之,西部最低;而实际技术效率呈现单调递增的变动趋势,中部最高,东部次之,西部最低.(2)政策扶持对于地区技术效率的提升具有重大的推动作用,贡献率高达71.4%;政府管理绩效呈现"U型"波动趋势(江西,湖北,海南除外),且东部地区高出中西部约8.9%和3.2%.作为技术效率和经营管理绩效实证研究的技术基础,四阶段SFA模型为优化资源配置提供了很好参考.
為剋服三階段DEA模型忽略瞭投入-產齣之間統計譟聲對技術效率的影響這一不足,將環境因素細分為員工工作環境和管理環境兩類,提齣瞭一種基于隨機前沿分析(stochastic frontier analysis)技術的四階段模型.通過對比剔除管理環境因素前後的技術效率,得到動態經營管理效率(management efficiency).進一步,利用四階段SFA模型對2002-2010年間我國省際技術效率和政府管理績效進行瞭測算.研究髮現:(1)我國整體、三大地區及各省區綜閤技術效率均呈現"U型"波動趨勢,且東部地區最高,中部次之,西部最低;而實際技術效率呈現單調遞增的變動趨勢,中部最高,東部次之,西部最低.(2)政策扶持對于地區技術效率的提升具有重大的推動作用,貢獻率高達71.4%;政府管理績效呈現"U型"波動趨勢(江西,湖北,海南除外),且東部地區高齣中西部約8.9%和3.2%.作為技術效率和經營管理績效實證研究的技術基礎,四階段SFA模型為優化資源配置提供瞭很好參攷.
위극복삼계단DEA모형홀략료투입-산출지간통계조성대기술효솔적영향저일불족,장배경인소세분위원공공작배경화관리배경량류,제출료일충기우수궤전연분석(stochastic frontier analysis)기술적사계단모형.통과대비척제관리배경인소전후적기술효솔,득도동태경영관리효솔(management efficiency).진일보,이용사계단SFA모형대2002-2010년간아국성제기술효솔화정부관리적효진행료측산.연구발현:(1)아국정체、삼대지구급각성구종합기술효솔균정현"U형"파동추세,차동부지구최고,중부차지,서부최저;이실제기술효솔정현단조체증적변동추세,중부최고,동부차지,서부최저.(2)정책부지대우지구기술효솔적제승구유중대적추동작용,공헌솔고체71.4%;정부관리적효정현"U형"파동추세(강서,호북,해남제외),차동부지구고출중서부약8.9%화3.2%.작위기술효솔화경영관리적효실증연구적기술기출,사계단SFA모형위우화자원배치제공료흔호삼고.
For overcoming the drawback that the three-stage DEA model neglects the input-output statistical noise,we put forward a new four-stage SFA model by dividing environmental factors into employee working and management environment.By comparing the technical efficiencies before and after removing the management environmental effects,we can get the corresponding dynamic management efficiency.Further,we use it to evaluate each provincial technical efficiency and government performance covering the period 2002-2010 in China.Results show that:(1) The overall,regional and provincial comprehensive technical efficiencies present the "U-Style" trend,and the east area is the highest,which is followed by the central and west areas.In contrast,the actual technical efficiencies keep increasing,and the central area is the highest,followed by the east and west areas.(2) Government policies play an important role in promoting local technical efficiency with the contribution rate up to 71.4 percent;most provincial management efficiencies present the "U-Style" trend(except Jiangxi,Hubei and Hainan).The east area’s mean management efficiency is higher than the central area about 8.9 percent and the west area about 3.2 percent.As the technical basis of empirical research on estimating the technical efficiency and management efficiency,the four-stage SFA provides a good reference for optimizing resource allocation.