CAJ | 학술논문

新《民事诉讼法》第55条将“侵害公共利益”作为判断案件类型并决定诉讼形式的逻辑起点,其目的本在于公益救济,但却因公共利益的不确定性导致了法律适用的困境,反而妨碍了对公益的有效救济.去除第55条中的“公共利益”,通过在团体诉讼框架内案件类型的分化,却能够从结果意义上达成对公益的救济.因为无论是不作为之诉还是小额多数的损害赔偿之诉,均从保护个人利益迈向了保护一般权益,发挥着制止和威慑不法侵害的功能,在客观上发挥着救济公益的作用.
신《민사소송법》제55조장“침해공공이익”작위판단안건류형병결정소송형식적라집기점,기목적본재우공익구제,단각인공공이익적불학정성도치료법률괄용적곤경,반이방애료대공익적유효구제.거제제55조중적“공공이익”,통과재단체소송광가내안건류형적분화,각능구종결과의의상체성대공익적구제.인위무론시불작위지소환시소액다수적손해배상지소,균종보호개인이익매향료보호일반권익,발휘착제지화위섭불법침해적공능,재객관상발휘착구제공익적작용.
In Article 55 of the Civil Procedure Law, encroachment on public interest is the logical start- point to decidd the category of the case and form of the litigation in order to remedy the public interest, while uncertainty of public interest results in the predicament when applying the law and hinders the remedy. Thus, removing public interest from Article 55 and categorization of the cases in class action might lead to remedy of the public interest. For those frequent actions for small damages or prohibitory injunctions, it is moving from protecting individual interest towards protecting general interest and deterring the unlawful infringement objec- tively remedying the public interest.