CAJ | 학술논문

采用句-图匹配范式考察汉语双重否定的加工方式以及句子形式与语义对句子加工的影响,实验1和实验2分别以祈使句和反问句为对象进行探讨。结果发现：（1）双重否定是整体加工的;（2）在理解初期（250ms）,否定反问句、双重否定祈使句与肯定祈使句的加工模式一致,都直接表征事件的实际状态;（3）当句子形式与语义不一致时,读者更多地受到句子语义影响。研究表明,在双重否定加工机制的理论解释中,命题表征理论和经验模拟理论都有一定的合理性,也都存在一定片面性。
채용구-도필배범식고찰한어쌍중부정적가공방식이급구자형식여어의대구자가공적영향,실험1화실험2분별이기사구화반문구위대상진행탐토。결과발현：（1）쌍중부정시정체가공적;（2）재리해초기（250ms）,부정반문구、쌍중부정기사구여긍정기사구적가공모식일치,도직접표정사건적실제상태;（3）당구자형식여어의불일치시,독자경다지수도구자어의영향。연구표명,재쌍중부정가공궤제적이론해석중,명제표정이론화경험모의이론도유일정적합이성,야도존재일정편면성。
Psychologists have proposed some convincing theories about the processing of negation, among which propositional theory and experiential-simulations view are especially well known. Double negative sentence is a special negative sentence. It expresses an affi rmative meaning with a negative form. Using sentence-picture-verification paradigm this research aimed to investigate the early processing mechanism of double negative words. This research offered new experimental evidence for propositional theory and experiential-simulations view. Experiment 1 used imperative sentences to examine the early processing mechanism of double negative words. The experiment used three factors mixed design. Sentence presentation is a between-subjects factor and other two variables, including sentence types and sentence-fi gure matching relationships, are within-subjects factors. This experiment demanded the participants to judge whether the pictures are consistent with the sentences. The main results were as follows： a main effect of sentence presentation emerged. Participants reacted more quickly when the sentences appeared as a whole than part by part. This didn＇t conform to propositional theory. In addition, an interaction between sentence types and matching relationship was observed. Affi rmative sentences and double negative sentences reached the match effect. This didn＇t conform to two-step-simulation hypothesis.Experiment 2 used rhetorical questions to observe the infl uence made by the discord of sentence structure and semantic meaning upon the sentence processing. The procedure and design are the same as Experiment 1. However, the experimental materials were changed by rhetorical questions. The result showed that in the early state of understanding, negative rhetorical questions had match effect, while affi rmative rhetorical questions and double negative rhetorical questions didn＇t. It implied that the processing of negative rhetorical questions is the same as affi rmative imperative sentences and double negative imperative sentences which are one-step stimulation. When sentence structures are inconsistent with semantic meaning, readers are more infl uenced by the sentence semantic. From the results, three conclusions were drawn：（1）The processing of double negative words was global, which was in discord with propositional theory.（2） During the early state of understanding, the processing of double negative imperative sentences and negative rhetorical questions are the same, which is one-step simulation.（3） When the sentence structures are inconsistent with semantic meaning, readers are more infl uenced by the sentence semantic. In sum, in the explanations of the processing mechanism of double negative, propositional theory and experiential-simulations view were reasonable and unilateral at the same time.