河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2014年
12期
188~195
,共null页
起诉裁量权 检察组织 检察官 价值 理性
起訴裁量權 檢察組織 檢察官 價值 理性
기소재량권 검찰조직 검찰관 개치 이성
prosecution discretion ; procuratorial organization ; value ; rationality of public ; procurators
2012年刑诉法的再修改，在酌定不起诉的基础上，又增设了附条件不起诉，进一步扩大了起诉裁量权的空间。但与此背反的是，在目前法治环境和制度结构下，起诉裁量存在着缺乏程序正当化构造、业绩考核不合理、起诉裁量基准不明确、不起诉替代性处置措施不足等病理，严重影响了起诉裁裁量权运行的合法性和有效性，诱发了检察机关基于组织理性严格控制起诉裁量权的行动逻辑；检察官基于个体理性懈怠行使起诉裁量权的策略行为，使起诉裁量权的“怠用”固化为可怕司法惯性。必须从增强起诉裁量权运行的合法性和有效性人手，构建起诉裁量的正当化程序，明确起诉裁量标准，充实不起诉替代性处置措施，增强社会公众理解认同、增加检察官中立性，进而改变检察组织和检察官的行动逻辑，实现起诉裁量权从价值回归到理性回归。
2012年刑訴法的再脩改，在酌定不起訴的基礎上，又增設瞭附條件不起訴，進一步擴大瞭起訴裁量權的空間。但與此揹反的是，在目前法治環境和製度結構下，起訴裁量存在著缺乏程序正噹化構造、業績攷覈不閤理、起訴裁量基準不明確、不起訴替代性處置措施不足等病理，嚴重影響瞭起訴裁裁量權運行的閤法性和有效性，誘髮瞭檢察機關基于組織理性嚴格控製起訴裁量權的行動邏輯；檢察官基于箇體理性懈怠行使起訴裁量權的策略行為，使起訴裁量權的“怠用”固化為可怕司法慣性。必鬚從增彊起訴裁量權運行的閤法性和有效性人手，構建起訴裁量的正噹化程序，明確起訴裁量標準，充實不起訴替代性處置措施，增彊社會公衆理解認同、增加檢察官中立性，進而改變檢察組織和檢察官的行動邏輯，實現起訴裁量權從價值迴歸到理性迴歸。
2012년형소법적재수개，재작정불기소적기출상，우증설료부조건불기소，진일보확대료기소재량권적공간。단여차배반적시，재목전법치배경화제도결구하，기소재량존재착결핍정서정당화구조、업적고핵불합리、기소재량기준불명학、불기소체대성처치조시불족등병리，엄중영향료기소재재량권운행적합법성화유효성，유발료검찰궤관기우조직이성엄격공제기소재량권적행동라집；검찰관기우개체이성해태행사기소재량권적책략행위，사기소재량권적“태용”고화위가파사법관성。필수종증강기소재량권운행적합법성화유효성인수，구건기소재량적정당화정서，명학기소재량표준，충실불기소체대성처치조시，증강사회공음리해인동、증가검찰관중립성，진이개변검찰조직화검찰관적행동라집，실현기소재량권종개치회귀도이성회귀。
2012 points to modify again, on the basis of discretion not to prosecute, and add the attach conditions not to prosecute, further expand the space of prosecution discretion, But at the back of the is that under the present system and the rule of law environment and structure, prosecution discretion to justify structure, there is a lack of program performance is not reasonable, the prosecution discretion benchmark is not clear, not to prosecute insufficient alternative disposal measures such as pathology, seriously has affected the prosecution discretion to cutting the legitimacy and effectiveness, and induce the procuratorial organs based on organizational rational strictly control the action logic of prosecutiondiscretion; Prosecutor is based on the strategic behavior of individual rationality slack exercise of prosecution discretion, make the prosecution discretion ＂idle＂ terrible curing for judicial inertia. Must be from enhancing the legitimacy and effectiveness of prosecution discretion, construction of prosecution discretion to justify procedures, clear standard of prosecution discretion, enrich not to prosecute alternative disposal measures, strengthen social neutrality, increase public understanding of identity, prosecutors, in turn, change the procuratorial organization and prosecutors action logic, realization of prosecution discretion from the value return to rational regression.
