CAJ | 학술논문

我国意定动产担保物权在立法上分类为动产抵押权、动产质权和权利质权；在此基础上，立法又分别规定各类意定动产担保物权的“定义、担保物、担保物权的设定、公示、效力、顺位、实现和消灭”等。意定动产担保物权分类的结构模式易于导致立法者对全局性制度的疏忽或遗漏，在此基础上，对各类意定动产担保物权的分别规定又可诱发制度之间的重复、不协调甚而冲突或矛盾。实证考察可以发现，我国意定动产担保物权法制在以上两个方面均存在重大缺陷，这些缺陷的现实存在佐证了以上学理认知。解决问题的近期措施是加强司法解释工作，以解司法亟需；远期目标则是制定一元的意定动产担保物权法，以替代现有的多元的意定动产担保物权法。以此，我国意定动产担保物权法制得以现代化。
아국의정동산담보물권재입법상분류위동산저압권、동산질권화권리질권；재차기출상，입법우분별규정각류의정동산담보물권적“정의、담보물、담보물권적설정、공시、효력、순위、실현화소멸”등。의정동산담보물권분류적결구모식역우도치입법자대전국성제도적소홀혹유루，재차기출상，대각류의정동산담보물권적분별규정우가유발제도지간적중복、불협조심이충돌혹모순。실증고찰가이발현，아국의정동산담보물권법제재이상량개방면균존재중대결함，저사결함적현실존재좌증료이상학리인지。해결문제적근기조시시가강사법해석공작，이해사법극수；원기목표칙시제정일원적의정동산담보물권법，이체대현유적다원적의정동산담보물권법。이차，아국의정동산담보물권법제득이현대화。
Chinese legislation classifies appointed right in rem for security on moveables into chattel mortgages, pledge of movables, and pledge of rights and, on the basis of such classification, provides for the ＂definition, security, creation, public notification, effect, priority, realization and elimination of security＂ for each one of them. The structure of this classification mode can easily lead to the neglecting or omission by legislators of the overall system, and the separate stipulations on different types of appointed right in rem for security may lead to repetition, discordance and conflicts between different systems. Empirical study shows that the Chinese system of appointed right in rem for security on moveables has major defects in both of the above-mentioned two aspects and the actual existence of these defects provides support to the above-mentioned theoretical propositions. The short-term solution to this problem is to strengthen the judicial interpretation of legislation, so as to meet the urgent need of judicial practice. The long-term solution is to adopt a unified law on appointed right in rem for security on moveables to replace the existing pluralistic law, so as to modernize the system of appointed right in rem for security in China.