CAJ | 학술논문

实验采用事件相关电位（ERPs）技术，以大学生为被试，运用非洲、欧洲、亚洲三个不同种族的面孔照片，探究异族效应与加工方式的关系。行为实验结果显示，被试对非洲面孔的反应时快于欧洲面孔，且两者均快于亚洲面孔。ERP研究结果显示，亚洲面孔的N170波幅显著小于非洲和欧洲面孔的波幅，后两者的N170波幅没有差异，而且亚洲面孔的倒置效应最大。研究结果说明相对于异族面孔，本族面孔更多地使用构型编码的加工方式，且N170成分表现出右半球优势。
실험채용사건상관전위（ERPs）기술，이대학생위피시，운용비주、구주、아주삼개불동충족적면공조편，탐구이족효응여가공방식적관계。행위실험결과현시，피시대비주면공적반응시쾌우구주면공，차량자균쾌우아주면공。ERP연구결과현시，아주면공적N170파폭현저소우비주화구주면공적파폭，후량자적N170파폭몰유차이，이차아주면공적도치효응최대。연구결과설명상대우이족면공，본족면공경다지사용구형편마적가공방식，차N170성분표현출우반구우세。
In the literature, it is established that people are better at recognizing faces from their own race relative to faces from other races. This phenomenon is called other-race effect. There have been studies to try to explain this phenomenon. The results indicated that same race faces involved more configural/holistic processing than other race faces. But the theoretical explanation of this phenomenon is still controversial. This study aimed to investigate the neural mechanism underlying the other-race effect, in particular at what stage of face processing differences between same-race and other-race stimuli occur. Event-related potentials technique and a race categorization task were used to explore the neural mechanism of face processing. The materials consisted photographs of Caucasian, African, Asian faces （10 per race and half women）. The faces were presented in a frontal view with a neutral expression without distinctive features. The participants were asked to identify as fast and correctly as possible whether face stimuli belonged to their own race or not by pressing with one of two computer keys, during which ERPs were recorded. Each of the three ethnic groups was presented in uptight and inverted orientations. It was repeated 4 times in one orientation. Thus, a total of 480 trials were presented in 6 experimental blocks with self-timed breaks in-between. Each block consisted of 80 trials. They were presented in a pseudo-random order to avoid immediate repetition of the same stimulus. Before a formal experiment, there was a practice. The participants can enter a formal experiment until accuracy rate was reached 80%. The results were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA. Greenhouse - Geisser corrections were applied with adjusted degrees of freedom. The results show that for the upright orientation, the peak N170 amplitude was lower for Asian than Caucasian （p〈.05） faces, and the former lower than African （,o〈.05） faces. Significant difference was not found between Caucasian and African faces （p〉.05）. And inversion effects were significant for all racial groups. It suggested that the peak N170 amplitude was lower for the upright orientation than the inverted orientation. Thus, the inverted faces involved more featural processing than the upright faces. What＇s more, we indicated that same-race faces involved more configural/holistic processing, and other-race faces contained more featural processing. More importantly, we found that there was no significant difference between Caucasian and African faces, which can prove our hypothesis to some extent. Previous literatures always presented the differences between the amplitude of same- race and other-race faces. However, this study not only presented the differences between the amplitude of same-race and other-race faces, but also presented the differences between the amplitude of other-race faces. There was no significant interaction between race and orientation. This result was different from some literatures. We considered that Chinese subjects were better at configural/holistic processing. Regardless of races and orientations, configural/holistic processing was involved more or less. Thus there was no significant interaction. This study demonstrates that same-race faces involve more configural/holistic processing than other-race faces, and there is a right hemisphere superiority of N170. Also, we find that the results are differences between Chinese subjects and Caucasian subjects.