CAJ | 학술논문

对158名大学生进行实验研究，探讨观点采择在影响共情性尴尬的过程中，尴尬类型与共情反应的不同作用。结果表明：（1）共情反应在观点采择与共情性尴尬之间起中介作用；（2）这种中介作用受到尴尬类型的调节，即在自尊模型和违背他人意愿模型下，共情反应在观点采择对共情性尴尬的影响中起到完全中介作用；在戏剧模型和非意愿暴露模型下，共情反应在观点采择对共情性尴尬的影响中起部分中介作用。
대158명대학생진행실험연구，탐토관점채택재영향공정성감개적과정중，감개류형여공정반응적불동작용。결과표명：（1）공정반응재관점채택여공정성감개지간기중개작용；（2）저충중개작용수도감개류형적조절，즉재자존모형화위배타인의원모형하，공정반응재관점채택대공정성감개적영향중기도완전중개작용；재희극모형화비의원폭로모형하，공정반응재관점채택대공정성감개적영향중기부분중개작용。
The present study is to probe the role of empathic response, perspective taking and embarrassing situation in the mental mechanism of empathic embarrassment. Four embarrassing situations were used to represent the four typical models of embarrassment, which included the self-esteem model（M1）, the dramaturgic model（M2）, the transgression of others＇ expectations model（M3） and the unwanted exposure model （M4）, and which presented by recording. Every situation was recorded into a male and a female version. The perspective taking subscale of IRI was used to ensure the ability of trait perspective taking at the corporate level between the perspective taking （PT） and the non-perspective taking （non-PT） group. The procedure of the Experiment were as follows： before participants finished listening to one recording, they were informed the instruction of PT or non-PT for non- PT（N=41） and PT （N= 117）group ,and then written other three questionnaires in turn. Data were analyzed by variance analysis, correlation analysis,and mediating effects regression analysis. The results indicated that （1） there aren＇t significant differences on the trait perspective-taking between PT and non-PT group, and main effects of PT, empathic response and empathic embarrassment among four models of embarrassment were significant; （2） Regression analysis shows： in four models and in presumptive models, the regression coefficient of the dependent variable（empathic embarrassment） on the independent variable（PT）（M1 ：β=.24, t=2.38,p〈.05; M2：β=.28, t=3.15,p〈.01; M3： β=.25, t=-2.78, p〈.01; M4： β=.37, t=4.30,p〈.001）, the supposed mediator on the independent variable（M1：β=.22, t=2.14, p〈.05; M2：β=.20, t=2.21, p〈.05; M3：β=.31, t==3.45, p〈.001; M4： β=.45, t=-5.43, p〈.001）, and the dependent variable on the supposed mediator（M1：/3=.32, t=3.27, p〈.01; M2：β=.30, t=2.56, p〈.01; M3：β=.50, t=6.05, p〈.001; M4： β=.29, t=3.14, p〈,05） are all significant. Meanwhile, when the mediator （empathic response） goes into the regression equation, the regression coefficient of the dependent variable on the independent variable are still significant in both M2 and M4, but not in both M1 and M3.So the mediating effect is significant. （3） Mediating effect of empathic response is moderated by embarrassing situation. These findings above suggest that, in the situation of negative valuation （M1 and M3）, empathic response must be enhanced; however, in the accidental situation （M2 and M4）, the greater perspective-taking can improve individual＇s empathic embarrassment directly or through empathic response indirectly.