浙江大学学报:人文社会科学版
浙江大學學報:人文社會科學版
절강대학학보:인문사회과학판
Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
2014年
6期
35~49
,共null页
非传统安全 粮食贸易安全 指标体系 粮食安全 安全状态 变化趋势 影响因素
非傳統安全 糧食貿易安全 指標體繫 糧食安全 安全狀態 變化趨勢 影響因素
비전통안전 양식무역안전 지표체계 양식안전 안전상태 변화추세 영향인소
non-traditional security; food trade security; an indicator system; food security; security status; variation trend; influencing factors
基于非传统安全视角,在综合考虑国内外粮食市场行情、外部冲击因素、内部产业因素和受控可能性的基础上,构建粮食贸易安全水平的评价指标体系,并对我国粮食贸易安全水平进行测度后发现:19922011年我国粮食贸易安全状态多为贸易弱态和贸易劣态,总体处于基本安全和基本不安全状态,且口粮和饲料粮的贸易安全状态高于工业用粮;在粮食贸易安全变化趋势上,小麦贸易安全水平有小幅上升,而稻米贸易安全水平波幅减小且略有下降,玉米贸易安全水平围绕0值上下波动,大豆贸易安全水平呈“阶梯式”下降;我国粮食贸易安全的主要影响因素依次是产业竞争力、国内市场行情、外部冲击因素、产业政策、受控可能性和国际市场行情。
基于非傳統安全視角,在綜閤攷慮國內外糧食市場行情、外部遲擊因素、內部產業因素和受控可能性的基礎上,構建糧食貿易安全水平的評價指標體繫,併對我國糧食貿易安全水平進行測度後髮現:19922011年我國糧食貿易安全狀態多為貿易弱態和貿易劣態,總體處于基本安全和基本不安全狀態,且口糧和飼料糧的貿易安全狀態高于工業用糧;在糧食貿易安全變化趨勢上,小麥貿易安全水平有小幅上升,而稻米貿易安全水平波幅減小且略有下降,玉米貿易安全水平圍繞0值上下波動,大豆貿易安全水平呈“階梯式”下降;我國糧食貿易安全的主要影響因素依次是產業競爭力、國內市場行情、外部遲擊因素、產業政策、受控可能性和國際市場行情。
기우비전통안전시각,재종합고필국내외양식시장행정、외부충격인소、내부산업인소화수공가능성적기출상,구건양식무역안전수평적평개지표체계,병대아국양식무역안전수평진행측도후발현:19922011년아국양식무역안전상태다위무역약태화무역렬태,총체처우기본안전화기본불안전상태,차구량화사료량적무역안전상태고우공업용량;재양식무역안전변화추세상,소맥무역안전수평유소폭상승,이도미무역안전수평파폭감소차략유하강,옥미무역안전수평위요0치상하파동,대두무역안전수평정“계제식”하강;아국양식무역안전적주요영향인소의차시산업경쟁력、국내시장행정、외부충격인소、산업정책、수공가능성화국제시장행정。
As economic globalization deepens and food trade increases, it's crucial to measure and evaluate China's food trade security from the non-traditional security perspective. From a single country's perspective, food trade security means a country can take effective measures to resist the impacts of external factors, such as sharp price fluctuations, grain embargo, international political and economical crisis, and obtain the needed food through trade to fill domestic food gap. In view of multiple countries, food trade safety is the superior co-existence between food trade subjects. Various food trade subjects gain sustainable development through mutual reciprocity and benefits by food trade. Principal component analysis (PCA) was taken to measure China's food trade security level. The conclusion is: First, from 1992 to 2011 the overall security situation of China's food trade ismostly in the weakening and degradation survival state, involved between basic safety and basic insecurity, and wheat, rice and corn trade have higher security state than soybean. Second, wheat trade security has a small rise, the rice trade security has fallen slightly, corn trade security fluctuates around zero, and soybean trade security step down. Third, the main influences on China's grain trade security, in sequence of importance, include the competitiveness of the industry, the domestic market, the external impact factors, industrial policy, the possibility of being controlled and the international market. This article may have three innovations. (1) The research contents focus on China's grain trade security, which the existing research has not been carried out in depth. (2) The measurement thought marks a step in advance of traditional security concept, deeming the superior co-existence between China and her food trade partners as trade safety, extending trade safety's boundary to multilateral security constructions, emphasizing on nationally, regionally and globally trade policy coordination and trade rules revision, and joint responses to global food crisis. (3)This article evaluates trade security from three dimensions, including " security transformation," "security threats," and "security sense. " First, considering the program from domestic and foreign perspectives, to what extent the factors leading to China's grain trade "safety" problems are investigated, including world food gap, international food price volatility, domestic food gap and per capita food purchasing power. Next, how the factors threaten China's grain trade security are examined, such as the volatility of international financial assets price, energy price and the exchange rate, and the domestic food industry's competitiveness. Then, the possibility of being controlled is introduced as simple objective decision criteria for "trade security sense. " The deficiency of this article is the political changes and wars are not taken into account in evaluating food trade security because they are sudden and hard to quantify.