法律科学:西北政法学院学报
法律科學:西北政法學院學報
법률과학:서북정법학원학보
Science of Law
2014年
6期
52~62
,共null页
罪刑关系 罪刑均衡 罪责刑相适应 人 刑事责任
罪刑關繫 罪刑均衡 罪責刑相適應 人 刑事責任
죄형관계 죄형균형 죄책형상괄응 인 형사책임
the relationship of crime and punishment; -~ance between crime and punishment; responsibility forcriminal suit; perpetrator; criminal liability.
刑法理论发展史上,经由刑事古典学派与刑事实证学派的对立纷争,罪刑关系经历了从罪刑均衡到"人"刑对应的演绎脉络。我国当代刑法理论确定罪责刑相适应原则,藉由刑事责任论的建构和充实,较为完美地实现了罪刑关系范畴中行为考察和行为人评价的统一。梳理从罪刑均衡到罪责刑相适应的发展历程,可以看出,伴随刑法理论的发展,犯罪人逐渐实现从消隐到凸显的地位变迁。当代刑法学的发展方向,应是日益重视行为人主体地位的确立和人格特征的评价。以此为视角,我国刑法学应从理论上更加重视主观因素和行为人因素的植入,在实践中更加关注行为人人身危险性的评价和犯罪恶性的改造。
刑法理論髮展史上,經由刑事古典學派與刑事實證學派的對立紛爭,罪刑關繫經歷瞭從罪刑均衡到"人"刑對應的縯繹脈絡。我國噹代刑法理論確定罪責刑相適應原則,藉由刑事責任論的建構和充實,較為完美地實現瞭罪刑關繫範疇中行為攷察和行為人評價的統一。梳理從罪刑均衡到罪責刑相適應的髮展歷程,可以看齣,伴隨刑法理論的髮展,犯罪人逐漸實現從消隱到凸顯的地位變遷。噹代刑法學的髮展方嚮,應是日益重視行為人主體地位的確立和人格特徵的評價。以此為視角,我國刑法學應從理論上更加重視主觀因素和行為人因素的植入,在實踐中更加關註行為人人身危險性的評價和犯罪噁性的改造。
형법이론발전사상,경유형사고전학파여형사실증학파적대립분쟁,죄형관계경력료종죄형균형도"인"형대응적연역맥락。아국당대형법이론학정죄책형상괄응원칙,자유형사책임론적건구화충실,교위완미지실현료죄형관계범주중행위고찰화행위인평개적통일。소리종죄형균형도죄책형상괄응적발전역정,가이간출,반수형법이론적발전,범죄인축점실현종소은도철현적지위변천。당대형법학적발전방향,응시일익중시행위인주체지위적학립화인격특정적평개。이차위시각,아국형법학응종이론상경가중시주관인소화행위인인소적식입,재실천중경가관주행위인인신위험성적평개화범죄악성적개조。
During the history of the criminal law theory, with the confliction between the idea of criminal classical school and criminal positivism school, the relationship of criminology and criminal law went through the process from the balance between crime and penalty to correspondence of criminal and penalty. Modem criminal law theory has confirmed the principle of compatibility of crime, which has perfectly achieved the unity of criminal behavioral study and the perpetrator evaluation in the relationship of criminology and criminal lawby the construction and enrichment of criminal responsibility theory. By carding the process of development from balance between crime and punishment to the responsibility for criminal suit, it can be seen that 'the transition of the importance of perpetrator from blanking to the highlight gradually. The development direction of modem criminal law may focus more on the establishment of principle status of the perpetrator and the evaluation of personality characteristics. Based on this view, the criminal law study may put more emphasis on the implantation of subjective factor and perpetrator factor in the theory development and focus more on the evaluation of dangerousness of the perpetrator and criminal rehabilitation in practice.