CAJ | 학술논문

线性结构的Coe-Helpman模型只能测度货物贸易的物化型知识溢出效应。本文基于非物化型知识的空间属性将线性结构的Coe-Helpman模型在空间维度扩展为具有非线性结构的Coe-Helpman-Durbin模型,用于对比研究货物贸易与服务贸易的非物化型知识空间溢出效应。基于中国31省1992-2011年面板数据的检验结果表明：货物贸易与服务贸易非物化型知识的首次溢出均未能提升贸易进口地的全要素生产率、技术进步率和技术效率;但服务贸易非物化型知识的二次溢出却提升了进口地以外其他地区的全要素生产率、技术进步率和技术效率;而货物贸易非物化型知识的二次溢出仅提升了进口地以外其他地区的技术效率。
선성결구적Coe-Helpman모형지능측도화물무역적물화형지식일출효응。본문기우비물화형지식적공간속성장선성결구적Coe-Helpman모형재공간유도확전위구유비선성결구적Coe-Helpman-Durbin모형,용우대비연구화물무역여복무무역적비물화형지식공간일출효응。기우중국31성1992-2011년면판수거적검험결과표명：화물무역여복무무역비물화형지식적수차일출균미능제승무역진구지적전요소생산솔、기술진보솔화기술효솔;단복무무역비물화형지식적이차일출각제승료진구지이외기타지구적전요소생산솔、기술진보솔화기술효솔;이화물무역비물화형지식적이차일출부제승료진구지이외기타지구적기술효솔。
The linear Coe-Helpman model only applies to quantifying the spillover effect of embodied knowledge from trade in goods. By developing the linear Coe-Helpman model into a nonlinear spatial Durbin model, this paper draws on panel data covering 31 Chinese provinces from 1992 to 2011 to compare the intangible knowledge spillover effects between trade in goods and services trade. The result shows that the primary spillover of the imported non-embodied knowledge both in trade in goods and services trade fails to promote the local total factor productivity, technology efficiency and technology progress. But the secondary spillover of the imported non-embodied knowledge from services trade, however, is found to have promoted the neighboring areas＇ total factor productivity, technology efficiency and technology progress; however, the secondary spillover of the non-embodied knowledge from trade in goods is only found to have promoted the neighboring technology efficiency.