体育学刊
體育學刊
체육학간
Journal of Physical Education
2014年
6期
108~112
,共null页
周建东 于涛 魏丕勇 李储涛
週建東 于濤 魏丕勇 李儲濤
주건동 우도 위비용 리저도
学校体育 学习水平考试 考试制度 初中体育 山东省
學校體育 學習水平攷試 攷試製度 初中體育 山東省
학교체육 학습수평고시 고시제도 초중체육 산동성
school physical education;academic proficiency examination;examination system;junior high schoolphysical education;Shandong province
对山东省初中体育学业水平考试制度进行系统分析,认为山东省现行的初中体育学业水平考试制度存在5 大问题：将体育成绩计入中考总分与中考改革推行等级制相矛盾、过程性考核与终结性考核比重分配失衡、考试项目内容选择不合理、考试的免试与加分制度不公平、考试成绩的真实性得不到保障等.在对存在的问题进行分析基础上,提出解决问题的建议：第一,体育考试成绩不计入中考总分,推行细化等级评价制度;第二,考试采取过程性考核与终结性考核相结合方式,加强过程性考核的监管力度;第三,废除身高、体重、肺活量等项目,增加选测项目的数量;第四,严格细化体育考试的免试与加分制度,确保考试公平;第五,全面推行“电子化”考试,培养高素质考务人员,保证考试公开透明.
對山東省初中體育學業水平攷試製度進行繫統分析,認為山東省現行的初中體育學業水平攷試製度存在5 大問題：將體育成績計入中攷總分與中攷改革推行等級製相矛盾、過程性攷覈與終結性攷覈比重分配失衡、攷試項目內容選擇不閤理、攷試的免試與加分製度不公平、攷試成績的真實性得不到保障等.在對存在的問題進行分析基礎上,提齣解決問題的建議：第一,體育攷試成績不計入中攷總分,推行細化等級評價製度;第二,攷試採取過程性攷覈與終結性攷覈相結閤方式,加彊過程性攷覈的鑑管力度;第三,廢除身高、體重、肺活量等項目,增加選測項目的數量;第四,嚴格細化體育攷試的免試與加分製度,確保攷試公平;第五,全麵推行“電子化”攷試,培養高素質攷務人員,保證攷試公開透明.
대산동성초중체육학업수평고시제도진행계통분석,인위산동성현행적초중체육학업수평고시제도존재5 대문제：장체육성적계입중고총분여중고개혁추행등급제상모순、과정성고핵여종결성고핵비중분배실형、고시항목내용선택불합리、고시적면시여가분제도불공평、고시성적적진실성득불도보장등.재대존재적문제진행분석기출상,제출해결문제적건의：제일,체육고시성적불계입중고총분,추행세화등급평개제도;제이,고시채취과정성고핵여종결성고핵상결합방식,가강과정성고핵적감관력도;제삼,폐제신고、체중、폐활량등항목,증가선측항목적수량;제사,엄격세화체육고시적면시여가분제도,학보고시공평;제오,전면추행“전자화”고시,배양고소질고무인원,보증고시공개투명.
The authors analyzed the junior high school physical education academic proficiency examination systemin Shandong province, and concluded that the junior high school physical education academic proficiency examinationsystem currently effective in Shandong province had the following 5 major problems： counting physical educationscores into midterm examination total score contradicted the grade system implemented in midterm examinationreform; the distribution of proportions of procedural examinations and summative examinations were out ofbalance; examination item and content selection was irrational; the examination exemption and bonus point awardingsystem was unfair; the genuineness of examination scores was not ensured. Based on their analysis of the existingproblems, the authors offered the following ideas for solving the problems： 1）do not count physical educationexamination scores into midterm examination total score; implement a refined grade evaluation system; 2）give examinationsin a procedural examination and summative examination combined way; strengthen the supervision ofprocedural examinations; 3）get rid of such items as height, weight and lung capacity, and increase the number of optionaltest items; 4）strictly refine the physical education examination exemption and bonus point awarding system;ensure examination fairness; 5）comprehensively implement electronic examinations; cultivate high quality examiners;ensure examination transparency.
