CAJ | 학술논문

本文以内容分析法为主要研究方法,对我国图书情报领域权威期刊2003年至2013年间的数据引用行为进行调查分析.研究发现：数据引用在图书情报研究领域中的重要性正在逐步提升,总体而言虽然规范引用比率呈现逐渐走高的状态,但非规范引用比率仍然不可小视;《中国图书馆学报》和《大学图书馆学报》的数据引用现象较《情报学报》要更多一些,但《情报学报》的数据引用相对更为规范;数据引用行为较少及不规范引用大量存在的主要原因在于大量数据没有得到有效应用,已有数据可获得性较差,以及缺乏规范的数据引用格式.
본문이내용분석법위주요연구방법,대아국도서정보영역권위기간2003년지2013년간적수거인용행위진행조사분석.연구발현：수거인용재도서정보연구영역중적중요성정재축보제승,총체이언수연규범인용비솔정현축점주고적상태,단비규범인용비솔잉연불가소시;《중국도서관학보》화《대학도서관학보》적수거인용현상교《정보학보》요경다일사,단《정보학보》적수거인용상대경위규범;수거인용행위교소급불규범인용대량존재적주요원인재우대량수거몰유득도유효응용,이유수거가획득성교차,이급결핍규범적수거인용격식.
Using the method of content analysis, the authors studied the data citation behavior of the papers from top journals in library and information science in China between 2003 and 2013. The results show： Data citation is becoming more and more important in the field of library and information science. Although the percentage of standard citation is increasing gradually, the percentage of non＇standard citation can not be ignored; The data citation behavior in the papers from Journal of Library Science in China and Journal of Academic Libraries is more frequent than in the papers from Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, but the data citation behavior in the papers from Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information is more standardized; The main reasons of the lack and non- standard of data citation behavior include the lack of effective use of mass data, the poor accessibility of the existing data, and the lack of standard format of data citation. 2 figs. 6 tabs. 9 refs.