CAJ | 학술논문

民事纠纷的发生表明了当事人对利益状态的不满或者是对实体法效力的挑战和质疑,这足以构成司法救济介入的逻辑前提.无纠纷便无诉权,无诉权便无审判权,诉权与审判权存在着互动式的紧张关系,两者需要进行有效地对接才能完成诉讼程序的纠纷解决功能.概念法学认为,法官仅需采用“三段论式”的推理便可以对是否救济以及如何进行救济作出理性的判断.而利益法学认为,由于立法者对利益的安排具有滞后性的特点,当事人的诉求力与法院审判力之间存在一定的缝隙,因此有必要对审判权重新界定,以跨越该缝隙.
민사규분적발생표명료당사인대이익상태적불만혹자시대실체법효력적도전화질의,저족이구성사법구제개입적라집전제.무규분편무소권,무소권편무심판권,소권여심판권존재착호동식적긴장관계,량자수요진행유효지대접재능완성소송정서적규분해결공능.개념법학인위,법관부수채용“삼단론식”적추리편가이대시부구제이급여하진행구제작출이성적판단.이이익법학인위,유우입법자대이익적안배구유체후성적특점,당사인적소구력여법원심판력지간존재일정적봉극,인차유필요대심판권중신계정,이과월해봉극.
The civil disputes suggest the disatisfaction of letigants about the interest situation or the doubts about the effectiveness of substantial law, and which leads to the intervention of judicial remedies. The tentions between the action right and judicial power requires their effective connection so as to fulfill the procedural function of dispute resolution. The begriffs jurisprudence insists on the syllogism. However, jurisprudence of interest believes the lagging of the statutes, so there is a gap between the action of right and judicail power. In order to bridge the gap, we need to redefine the judicial power and span the gap.