CAJ | 학술논문

随着克里普克对规则遵循问题的解读及其引发的热议，意义与规范性成为语言哲学中难以回避的论题。克里普克的阐释表明倾向性解释无法为语言表达式的使用以及意义归因提供合理性辩护，倾向性行为的描述与规范性的结论之间存在着鸿沟。语言表达式的意义具有规范性维度，而这种规范性需要结合正确性、有效性等相关概念的辨明才能得以澄清。
수착극리보극대규칙준순문제적해독급기인발적열의，의의여규범성성위어언철학중난이회피적론제。극리보극적천석표명경향성해석무법위어언표체식적사용이급의의귀인제공합이성변호，경향성행위적묘술여규범성적결론지간존재착홍구。어언표체식적의의구유규범성유도，이저충규범성수요결합정학성、유효성등상관개념적변명재능득이징청。
With Kripke＇ s reading of rule - following and the subsequent heated discussions, the thesis of meaning and normativity has become an inevitable issue in philosophy of language. Kripke＇ s reading indicates that disposi- tional accounts cannot justify the use of expressions and meaning ascriptions, and there is a gap between the descrip- tions of dispositional behaviors and the normative conclusions. The meaning of expressions has normative dimension, and only by analyzing the related concepts, i. e. , correctness and effectiveness, can we clarify the normativity.