厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版
廈門大學學報:哲學社會科學版
하문대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Xiamen University(A Quarterly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
2014年
6期
26~36
,共null页
财政分权 经济增长效率 条件方向性距离函数 最优分权程度
財政分權 經濟增長效率 條件方嚮性距離函數 最優分權程度
재정분권 경제증장효솔 조건방향성거리함수 최우분권정도
fiscal decentralization, economic growth efficiency, conditional directional distance functions, optimal level of decentralization
财政分权既促进了中国经济增长,但也可能形成有偏的经济激励,形成负面产出。基于1985--2009年中国省际数据,利用Simar与Vanhems(2012)所提出的条件方向性距离函数(conditional directional distance functions),可测算以财政分权为条件并包含财政分权正面产出与负面产出的经济增长效率。以此为基础,可进一步检验财政分权与经济增长效率之间的非线性关系,估算面向经济增长效率的最优分权程度。实证研究表明,如果以经济增长效率为目标,当前我国大部分地区存在“过度分权”,而面向经济增长速度的最优分权水平也会高于面向经济增长效率的最优分权水平。
財政分權既促進瞭中國經濟增長,但也可能形成有偏的經濟激勵,形成負麵產齣。基于1985--2009年中國省際數據,利用Simar與Vanhems(2012)所提齣的條件方嚮性距離函數(conditional directional distance functions),可測算以財政分權為條件併包含財政分權正麵產齣與負麵產齣的經濟增長效率。以此為基礎,可進一步檢驗財政分權與經濟增長效率之間的非線性關繫,估算麵嚮經濟增長效率的最優分權程度。實證研究錶明,如果以經濟增長效率為目標,噹前我國大部分地區存在“過度分權”,而麵嚮經濟增長速度的最優分權水平也會高于麵嚮經濟增長效率的最優分權水平。
재정분권기촉진료중국경제증장,단야가능형성유편적경제격려,형성부면산출。기우1985--2009년중국성제수거,이용Simar여Vanhems(2012)소제출적조건방향성거리함수(conditional directional distance functions),가측산이재정분권위조건병포함재정분권정면산출여부면산출적경제증장효솔。이차위기출,가진일보검험재정분권여경제증장효솔지간적비선성관계,고산면향경제증장효솔적최우분권정도。실증연구표명,여과이경제증장효솔위목표,당전아국대부분지구존재“과도분권”,이면향경제증장속도적최우분권수평야회고우면향경제증장효솔적최우분권수평。
Fiscal decentralization has greatly promoted China's economic growth but it is likely to bring about biased e- conomic incentives and bad outputs. Based on China's provincial data from 1985 to 2009, this paper utilizes the conditional directional distance functions formulated by Simar and Vanhems (2012) to calculate the economic growth efficiency which depends on, and which includes the positive and negative outputs produced by, fiscal decentralization. It examines the non- linear relation between fiscal decentralization and economic growth efficiency and estimates the optimal level of decentraliza- tion for economic growth efficiency. Our empirical analysis indicates that there has been "over-decentralization" in most re- gions of China in terms of economic growth efficiency, and that the optimal level of decentralization for economic growth speed is often higher than that for economic growth efficiency.