商业经济与管理
商業經濟與管理
상업경제여관리
Business Economics and Administration
2014年
11期
57~65
,共null页
道德认同 领导-部属交换 团队-同事交换 自我效能 任务绩效
道德認同 領導-部屬交換 糰隊-同事交換 自我效能 任務績效
도덕인동 령도-부속교환 단대-동사교환 자아효능 임무적효
moral identity; leader-member exchange; team-member exchange ; self-efficacy; task performance
区别于道德决策理论对道德认同影响个体行为的解释,文章基于人际交换关系视角,探究领导-部属交换和团队-同事交换在道德认同影响任务绩效过程中的中介作用,并考察员工自我效能在以上关系中的调节作用。通过对343名企业员工开展两轮问卷调查,统计分析结果表明:(1)领导-部属交换和团队-同事交换在道德认同与任务绩效之间起部分中介作用;(2)自我效能显著调节了领导-部属交换/团队-同事交换与任务绩效的关系;(3)自我效能显著调节了领导-部属交换/团队-同事交换在道德认同与任务绩效之间的中介作用。
區彆于道德決策理論對道德認同影響箇體行為的解釋,文章基于人際交換關繫視角,探究領導-部屬交換和糰隊-同事交換在道德認同影響任務績效過程中的中介作用,併攷察員工自我效能在以上關繫中的調節作用。通過對343名企業員工開展兩輪問捲調查,統計分析結果錶明:(1)領導-部屬交換和糰隊-同事交換在道德認同與任務績效之間起部分中介作用;(2)自我效能顯著調節瞭領導-部屬交換/糰隊-同事交換與任務績效的關繫;(3)自我效能顯著調節瞭領導-部屬交換/糰隊-同事交換在道德認同與任務績效之間的中介作用。
구별우도덕결책이론대도덕인동영향개체행위적해석,문장기우인제교환관계시각,탐구령도-부속교환화단대-동사교환재도덕인동영향임무적효과정중적중개작용,병고찰원공자아효능재이상관계중적조절작용。통과대343명기업원공개전량륜문권조사,통계분석결과표명:(1)령도-부속교환화단대-동사교환재도덕인동여임무적효지간기부분중개작용;(2)자아효능현저조절료령도-부속교환/단대-동사교환여임무적효적관계;(3)자아효능현저조절료령도-부속교환/단대-동사교환재도덕인동여임무적효지간적중개작용。
Different from the explanation of the relationship between moral identity and individual behavior with the view of moral decision theory, this article examines the roles of leader-member exchange and team-member exchange as mediators between moral identity and task performance based on the perspective of interpersonal exchange relations. We also analyze self-efficacy as a moderator between leader-member exchange( Or team-member exchange) and task performance. By carrying out two surveys for 343 employees, the results show that leader-member exchange and team-member exchange partially mediate the relationship between moral identity and task performance. In addition, the relationship between leader-member exchange ( Or team-member exchange) and task performance become stronger as employee's self-efficacy growing from high to low. Furthermore, conditional indirect effect test demonstrate that the mediating effect of leader-member exchange( Or team-member exchange) on the moral identity-task per- formance linkage is significant only among employees with low levels of self-efficacy. Thus all hypotheses are supported.