CAJ | 학술논문

犯罪与刑罚谁决定谁，一直是学术界争论不休的问题。理论体系起点必须具备的要求，以及社会危害性观念存在的缺陷，说明刑法学的逻辑起点只能产生于刑罚目的之中。对犯罪原因的不同理解造成刑罚观念不同，进而导致犯罪观念不同，这已被刑法的演进路径所证明。刑法学派之争缘于刑罚目的观相异，并在犯罪论的理论层面引发了全面的论战。从刑罪关系的点线面考察，刑罚观决定犯罪观。
범죄여형벌수결정수，일직시학술계쟁론불휴적문제。이론체계기점필수구비적요구，이급사회위해성관념존재적결함，설명형법학적라집기점지능산생우형벌목적지중。대범죄원인적불동리해조성형벌관념불동，진이도치범죄관념불동，저이피형법적연진로경소증명。형법학파지쟁연우형벌목적관상이，병재범죄론적이론층면인발료전면적론전。종형죄관계적점선면고찰，형벌관결정범죄관。
It is an argumentative question in academe whether penal notion determines criminal notion or con- trarily. The logic jumping - off of criminal law can but produce from penal intention, considering the demands of sys- tem info and the limitation of social danger. Different comprehension of reasons of crime leads to different penal no- tion, which makes for different criminal notion. Those have been proved by evolutionary course of criminal law histo- ry. The dispute of criminal law school came of different notion of penal intention, which resulted in all around con- troversy on the theories of criminal idea. The tridimensional review of relationship of penality and crime has authen- ticated a rationale of criminal law that penal notion determines criminal notion.