CAJ | 학술논문

1920年的《斯匹次卑尔根群岛条约》在斯瓦尔巴德群岛确立了一套独一无二的法律制度。依据《斯约》挪威享有对斯岛陆地及其领海的主权。随着国际海洋法的发展,挪威作为《公约》缔约国开始主张更为广泛的海洋权利,由此引发了与缔约国之间的广泛争议。不可否认的是,挪威对斯岛的主权是基于条约义务下的有限主权,其主权来源的特殊性导致了权利行使范围的不确定,为缔约国做出合乎自己利益的解释留有余地。中国作为《斯约》的缔约国无需急于对这一问题表明态度立场,主张在《公约》框架下解决海洋纠纷,将之融入现有的国际秩序,是中国处理此类问题应有的一贯立场。
1920년적《사필차비이근군도조약》재사와이파덕군도학립료일투독일무이적법률제도。의거《사약》나위향유대사도륙지급기령해적주권。수착국제해양법적발전,나위작위《공약》체약국개시주장경위엄범적해양권리,유차인발료여체약국지간적엄범쟁의。불가부인적시,나위대사도적주권시기우조약의무하적유한주권,기주권래원적특수성도치료권리행사범위적불학정,위체약국주출합호자기이익적해석류유여지。중국작위《사약》적체약국무수급우대저일문제표명태도립장,주장재《공약》광가하해결해양규분,장지융입현유적국제질서,시중국처리차류문제응유적일관립장。
The Spitsbergen Treaty established a unique legal framework in Svalbard. Norway has been claiming sovereignty over Svalbard and territorial waters according to Spitsbergen Treaty. With the rapid development of the international maritime laws, Norway has claimed to have a broad sovereign right and provoked controversy between signatories. There is no denying that Norway＇s sovereignty over Svalbard is limited sovereignty based on Spitsbergen Treaty. The peculiarity of sovereignty over Svalbard may imply uncertainty, which leaves room for an explanation for interests of signatories. China as a signatory is in no hurry to show our stand on this problem. China always advocates resolving maritime disputes according to UNCLOS so that it can be incorporated into the existing international order, which is our consistent position on these issues.