知识产权
知識產權
지식산권
Intellectual Property
2014年
12期
3~9
,共null页
网络存储避风港 准入门槛 立法目的 无过错责任 过错责任
網絡存儲避風港 準入門檻 立法目的 無過錯責任 過錯責任
망락존저피풍항 준입문함 입법목적 무과착책임 과착책임
safe harbor for online storage; threshold; legislative purpose; no-fault liability; fault liability
＂全景视拓公司诉韩伟信息公司案＂审理法院认为,《信息网络传播权保护条例》规定的网络存储避风港存在准入门槛。《信息网络传播权保护条例》在制定过程中借鉴了美国《版权法》,美国《版权法》中的避风港是存在准入门槛的。美国《版权法》中的避风港能够免除网络服务商的无过错责任。美国网络服务商希望通过履行准入门槛中规定的义务,以进入避风港而获得免责。我国对网络服务商损害赔偿责任的认定采过错责任原则,并不承认网络服务商会因用户的侵权行为承担无过错责任。这一立法目的的差异导致避风港准入门槛在我国不能适用。
＂全景視拓公司訴韓偉信息公司案＂審理法院認為,《信息網絡傳播權保護條例》規定的網絡存儲避風港存在準入門檻。《信息網絡傳播權保護條例》在製定過程中藉鑒瞭美國《版權法》,美國《版權法》中的避風港是存在準入門檻的。美國《版權法》中的避風港能夠免除網絡服務商的無過錯責任。美國網絡服務商希望通過履行準入門檻中規定的義務,以進入避風港而穫得免責。我國對網絡服務商損害賠償責任的認定採過錯責任原則,併不承認網絡服務商會因用戶的侵權行為承擔無過錯責任。這一立法目的的差異導緻避風港準入門檻在我國不能適用。
＂전경시탁공사소한위신식공사안＂심리법원인위,《신식망락전파권보호조례》규정적망락존저피풍항존재준입문함。《신식망락전파권보호조례》재제정과정중차감료미국《판권법》,미국《판권법》중적피풍항시존재준입문함적。미국《판권법》중적피풍항능구면제망락복무상적무과착책임。미국망락복무상희망통과리행준입문함중규정적의무,이진입피풍항이획득면책。아국대망락복무상손해배상책임적인정채과착책임원칙,병불승인망락복무상회인용호적침권행위승담무과착책임。저일입법목적적차이도치피풍항준입문함재아국불능괄용。
In the case of Quanjing Shituo v. Hanwei, the court asserted that there are several thresholds in safe harbor for online storage according to Regulation on Protection of the Right of Communication through Information Network. China used American legislation experience for reference when the Regulation was drafted. U.S. Copyright Act established thresholds for safe harbor. The rules of safe harbor may exempt the no- fault liability of provider according to U.S. copyright law. In order to claim the exemption, the intemet service providers prefer to fulfill the obligation provided by safe harbors. However, fault liability principle in China was adopted from the Civil Law system for torts. Thus, it is improper for intemet service providers to undertake liability for the actions of subscribers. The difference in legislative purpose causes thresholds inapplicable to China.
