法律科学：西北政法学院学报
法律科學：西北政法學院學報
법률과학：서북정법학원학보
Science of Law
2015年
1期
110~118
,共null页
并存罪过 滥用职权罪 复杂罪过 基本罪过 加重罪过
併存罪過 濫用職權罪 複雜罪過 基本罪過 加重罪過
병존죄과 람용직권죄 복잡죄과 기본죄과 가중죄과
concurrent responsibility; offense of abuse of official capacity; complicated responsibility ; basic responsi-bility ; aggravated responsibility
传统罪过理论所坚持的“一个罪名、一种罪过”原则，不能合理地解释滥用职权罪等犯罪的罪过形式，“客观的超过要素”、“复合罪过”、“主要罪过”等学说也存在诸多理论缺陷和实践困惑。罪过形式包括简单罪过与复杂罪过，“并存罪过”是复杂罪过的一种表现形式，即一个犯罪的基本罪过或者加重罪过存在着既可以是故意、也可以是过失的情形。犯罪可以根据其基本罪过形态分为故意犯罪、过失犯罪和并存罪过犯罪三类。当一个犯罪的加重罪过属于“并存罪过”时，则应根据基本罪过来确定该罪的罪过类型。
傳統罪過理論所堅持的“一箇罪名、一種罪過”原則，不能閤理地解釋濫用職權罪等犯罪的罪過形式，“客觀的超過要素”、“複閤罪過”、“主要罪過”等學說也存在諸多理論缺陷和實踐睏惑。罪過形式包括簡單罪過與複雜罪過，“併存罪過”是複雜罪過的一種錶現形式，即一箇犯罪的基本罪過或者加重罪過存在著既可以是故意、也可以是過失的情形。犯罪可以根據其基本罪過形態分為故意犯罪、過失犯罪和併存罪過犯罪三類。噹一箇犯罪的加重罪過屬于“併存罪過”時，則應根據基本罪過來確定該罪的罪過類型。
전통죄과이론소견지적“일개죄명、일충죄과”원칙，불능합리지해석람용직권죄등범죄적죄과형식，“객관적초과요소”、“복합죄과”、“주요죄과”등학설야존재제다이론결함화실천곤혹。죄과형식포괄간단죄과여복잡죄과，“병존죄과”시복잡죄과적일충표현형식，즉일개범죄적기본죄과혹자가중죄과존재착기가이시고의、야가이시과실적정형。범죄가이근거기기본죄과형태분위고의범죄、과실범죄화병존죄과범죄삼류。당일개범죄적가중죄과속우“병존죄과”시，칙응근거기본죄과래학정해죄적죄과류형。
The principle of ＂one crime, only one kind of responsibility＂ supported by traditional theory on criminal re- sponsibility cannot properly explain the responsibility form of some crimes, such as the offense of abuse of official authority. The new concepts put forward by some criminal scholars, such as ＂primary guilty mind＂, ＂objective elements without re- sponsibility＂ and ＂compound fault＂ have also some inherent theory limitations and practical puzzlement. The form of re- sponsibility includes the simple responsibility and the complicated responsibility, and the concurrent responsibility is one form of the latter, which means the basic responsibility or the aggravated responsibility of a crime can be intentional as well as negligent. If the aggravated responsibility is concurrent with intention and negligence, the crime could be regarded as in- tentional crime or negligent crime according to the basic responsibility.
