南开管理评论
南開管理評論
남개관리평론
Nankai Business Review
2014年
6期
4~12
,共null页
企业社会责任 停止方式 持续时间 动机归因
企業社會責任 停止方式 持續時間 動機歸因
기업사회책임 정지방식 지속시간 동궤귀인
Corporate Social Responsibility; Quit Manner; Time Duration; Motive Attribution
企业社会责任方面的研究集中于探讨企业承担社会责任的正面影响,鲜有涉及企业停止承担社会责任的后果,致使学界和业界对企业社会责任的全面影响缺乏认识。本文通过三个研究,将触角延伸到企业停止承担社会责任的情形,从动态视角分析公众的态度变化。预研究通过论坛收集整理资料进行内容分析,提出研究问题。在此基础上,我们展开两个实证研究。研究一探究企业停止社会责任对公众态度的影响,以及不同方式对上述影响的调节作用。借鉴企业承担社会责任的方式分类,我们将企业停止承担社会责任的方式分为主动停止和被动停止。实验研究发现,企业承担社会责任虽然可以提高公众态度,但是停止承担社会责任又会降低公众态度,而且主动停止相对于被动停止的负面影响更大。因此,停止方式感知是影响公众态度的关键因素。随后,研究二探究企业如何影响公众对企业停止社会责任方式的感知。本研究引入一个重要的影响因素——企业承担社会责任的时间,并建立它对企业停止方式感知的作用机制。实验研究揭示,企业在停止前承担社会责任的时间越长,公众越相信企业是出于利他动机参与公益事业,进而推断企业更可能是被迫停止社会责任。本研究对企业社会责任的理论研究和管理实践均具有启示意义。
企業社會責任方麵的研究集中于探討企業承擔社會責任的正麵影響,鮮有涉及企業停止承擔社會責任的後果,緻使學界和業界對企業社會責任的全麵影響缺乏認識。本文通過三箇研究,將觸角延伸到企業停止承擔社會責任的情形,從動態視角分析公衆的態度變化。預研究通過論罈收集整理資料進行內容分析,提齣研究問題。在此基礎上,我們展開兩箇實證研究。研究一探究企業停止社會責任對公衆態度的影響,以及不同方式對上述影響的調節作用。藉鑒企業承擔社會責任的方式分類,我們將企業停止承擔社會責任的方式分為主動停止和被動停止。實驗研究髮現,企業承擔社會責任雖然可以提高公衆態度,但是停止承擔社會責任又會降低公衆態度,而且主動停止相對于被動停止的負麵影響更大。因此,停止方式感知是影響公衆態度的關鍵因素。隨後,研究二探究企業如何影響公衆對企業停止社會責任方式的感知。本研究引入一箇重要的影響因素——企業承擔社會責任的時間,併建立它對企業停止方式感知的作用機製。實驗研究揭示,企業在停止前承擔社會責任的時間越長,公衆越相信企業是齣于利他動機參與公益事業,進而推斷企業更可能是被迫停止社會責任。本研究對企業社會責任的理論研究和管理實踐均具有啟示意義。
기업사회책임방면적연구집중우탐토기업승담사회책임적정면영향,선유섭급기업정지승담사회책임적후과,치사학계화업계대기업사회책임적전면영향결핍인식。본문통과삼개연구,장촉각연신도기업정지승담사회책임적정형,종동태시각분석공음적태도변화。예연구통과론단수집정리자료진행내용분석,제출연구문제。재차기출상,아문전개량개실증연구。연구일탐구기업정지사회책임대공음태도적영향,이급불동방식대상술영향적조절작용。차감기업승담사회책임적방식분류,아문장기업정지승담사회책임적방식분위주동정지화피동정지。실험연구발현,기업승담사회책임수연가이제고공음태도,단시정지승담사회책임우회강저공음태도,이차주동정지상대우피동정지적부면영향경대。인차,정지방식감지시영향공음태도적관건인소。수후,연구이탐구기업여하영향공음대기업정지사회책임방식적감지。본연구인입일개중요적영향인소——기업승담사회책임적시간,병건립타대기업정지방식감지적작용궤제。실험연구게시,기업재정지전승담사회책임적시간월장,공음월상신기업시출우이타동궤삼여공익사업,진이추단기업경가능시피박정지사회책임。본연구대기업사회책임적이론연구화관리실천균구유계시의의。
Corporate social responsibility has its pros and cons. On the one hand, it can enhance consumers' attitude to the firms. On the other hand, it may be very costly as it requires a large amount of money or time investment. Hence, it is possible for firms to terminate social responsibility especially when they possess limited resources. Thus far, the literature in this area mainly focuses on the advantages of conducting social responsibility, with little attention to the consequences of terminating it. To fill this gap, we extend the research perspective from undertaking social responsibility to terminating it, with special emphasis on the change of consumer attitude to the firm. We conduct three studies to answer this question. In the pilot study, we focus on three recently occurred earthquakes in China, and collect consumer online comments on those firms who made donations in the first or second earthquakes, but reduced or stopped donation in later earthquakes. Through the content analysis of consumer comments, we found significant change of their attitude towards those firms who reduced or stopped donations. Based on that preliminary finding, we conduct two empirical studies. Study one investigated the impacts of quit manner on consumer attitude change towards the firm that quit social responsibility. Inspired by the literature, we classify the quit manner into passive quit and active quit. The results reveal that although consumers reduce their attitude towards those firms who quit social responsibility in general, they exhibit more favorable attitude towards those firms who quit passively than to those who quit actively. Therefore, the results of study one confirm the importance of quit manner. Study two goes further to examine one dominant of consumer perceptions of quit manner, namely time duration of the firm taking on social responsibility. The results indicate that the longer of time duration the firm took on social responsibility before quitting, the higher likelihood consumers conceive the firm quit passively. The underlying reason is that long time duration leads consumers to make altruistic motive attribution for firms to undertake social responsibility, which in turn induces passive quit perceptions. This research has significant implications for firms to conduct and terminate social responsibility.