CAJ | 학술논문

一如两百年前一样,人们似乎依旧习惯于仰仗国家来统筹整理法律,并借助综合性法典来展现法律。文章将探讨这种信赖在法典编纂中的合理性。文章着力论证,在信息化时代,法典编纂的法律信息供给功能可以借由比依赖国家创设法律体系更好的方式予以实现。信息化社会使得法律渊源具有多元性,并赋予了市民选择法律来经营生活的可能性。从传统来说,大陆法系以及普通法系国家在编纂法典以实现法律信息的系统化供给方面的经验表明,这些法典化活动能够满足当时的法律信息管理需要,但是传统的法律编纂方式却难以应对信息化社会的挑战。这促使法律需要以不同的姿态面向大众——在国家编纂法典或法律科学的形式之外,借助多元的可供受众选择的法律信息管理模式。
일여량백년전일양,인문사호의구습관우앙장국가래통주정리법률,병차조종합성법전래전현법률。문장장탐토저충신뢰재법전편찬중적합이성。문장착력론증,재신식화시대,법전편찬적법률신식공급공능가이차유비의뢰국가창설법률체계경호적방식여이실현。신식화사회사득법률연원구유다원성,병부여료시민선택법률래경영생활적가능성。종전통래설,대륙법계이급보통법계국가재편찬법전이실현법률신식적계통화공급방면적경험표명,저사법전화활동능구만족당시적법률신식관리수요,단시전통적법률편찬방식각난이응대신식화사회적도전。저촉사법률수요이불동적자태면향대음——재국가편찬법전혹법률과학적형식지외,차조다원적가공수음선택적법률신식관리모식。
The belief in presenting the law by way of comprehensive systematisation by national states seems to be as important today as it was 200 years ago. In this contribution it is investigated whether this belief in codification is still accurate. It is argued that the most important function of codification, namely to provide information about the law, can today be achieved in a much better way than through state-made systematisations. Legal science in information society is characterized by the multiplication of sources and enhanced possibilities for choice. Traditionally speaking, both civ- il law countries and common law countries once aim to systematically manage legal information through codification. Such codification can satisfy historical needs ,however,it can not meet the distinc- tive desire of information society.This calls for a different way of presenting the law to the general audience： not by way of national codification or through legal science ,but by creating alternative mod- els of legal information management.