四川师范大学学报:社会科学版
四川師範大學學報:社會科學版
사천사범대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Science Edition)
2015年
1期
100~108
,共null页
魏晋美学 嵇阮派 自然审美意识
魏晉美學 嵇阮派 自然審美意識
위진미학 혜원파 자연심미의식
the aesthetics of Wei-Jin;school of JI Kang and RUAN Ji;natural aesthetic conscious-ness
在魏晋美学中,竹林派的代表嵇康、阮籍极力主张“越名教而任自然”,推崇随意任心、顺其自然的审美意识。认为“越名任心”审美域的生成来自自由洒脱、任心自然。所谓“越名任心”,即自然而然、任其自然,其美学意义表征着对现实世界与“名教”的超越,对自我种种欲望的超越,实质上则意味着对超尘绝俗、一往不复的自由意志与独立精神的注重。在此意义上,淡泊、恬淡、自然、随意任心、顺其自然则成为嵇阮派美学自然审美意识的内在逻辑。这种越名任心、顺其自然并非认识论意义上的,而是一种诉诸于一己心灵体验的随意任心、顺其自然,可以称之为存在论美学的然其所然,是其所是。
在魏晉美學中,竹林派的代錶嵇康、阮籍極力主張“越名教而任自然”,推崇隨意任心、順其自然的審美意識。認為“越名任心”審美域的生成來自自由灑脫、任心自然。所謂“越名任心”,即自然而然、任其自然,其美學意義錶徵著對現實世界與“名教”的超越,對自我種種欲望的超越,實質上則意味著對超塵絕俗、一往不複的自由意誌與獨立精神的註重。在此意義上,淡泊、恬淡、自然、隨意任心、順其自然則成為嵇阮派美學自然審美意識的內在邏輯。這種越名任心、順其自然併非認識論意義上的,而是一種訴諸于一己心靈體驗的隨意任心、順其自然,可以稱之為存在論美學的然其所然,是其所是。
재위진미학중,죽림파적대표혜강、원적겁력주장“월명교이임자연”,추숭수의임심、순기자연적심미의식。인위“월명임심”심미역적생성래자자유쇄탈、임심자연。소위“월명임심”,즉자연이연、임기자연,기미학의의표정착대현실세계여“명교”적초월,대자아충충욕망적초월,실질상칙의미착대초진절속、일왕불복적자유의지여독립정신적주중。재차의의상,담박、념담、자연、수의임심、순기자연칙성위혜원파미학자연심미의식적내재라집。저충월명임심、순기자연병비인식론의의상적,이시일충소제우일기심령체험적수의임심、순기자연,가이칭지위존재론미학적연기소연,시기소시。
In the aesthetics of Wei-Jin, JI Kang and RUAN Ji, representatives of the bamboo school, strongly advocate “getting over the Confucian ethical code but letting the nature at ease”, and highly praise the aesthetic consciousness of following one’ s willingness in accordance with natural tenden-cy. Aesthetic domain of surmounting fame by heart comes from the freedom and the following of one’ s heart. Surmounting fame by heart means to let nature takes its course, with its aesthetic significance lying in the surmounting of reality, the Confucian ethnical code and various desires of oneself. Its essence is the emphasis on unearthly and on-going free will and independent spirit. Based on that, indifference, tranquility, nature and following one’ s willingness in accordance with natural tendency become the inner logic of nature aesthetic consciousness in school of JI Kang and RUAN Ji. Surmounting fame by heart in accordance with natural tendency is not epistemological, but is the following one’ s willingness in accord-ance with natural tendency resorting to one’ s soul experience, and thus is ontology aesthetics of making a thing what it is and as what it is.