学术月刊
學術月刊
학술월간
Academic Monthly
2015年
1期
53~61
,共null页
般若学 禅宗 即事而真 理事圆融 一切现成
般若學 禪宗 即事而真 理事圓融 一切現成
반약학 선종 즉사이진 리사원융 일절현성
Prajna-Buddhism, Chan Buddhism, "shi is all true", "li shi yuanrong"
般若学是禅宗的重要思想基础,但是在如来藏佛学以及崇尚自然、固守当下的华夏精神背景下,禅宗不自觉地对般若思想产生了一些误读:禅宗先是将般若的即色即空理解为即色即心,并在此基础上形成了即事而真的思想,然后又进一步将般若的性相不二理解为理事圆融,这两处误读决定了禅宗思想的本体论基础;与此相应,晚期禅宗的修道论也逐渐把般若的真俗平等理解为佛法现成。于是,禅宗的立场就从般若的色空、性相、真俗的双非双遣,不自觉地转移到理事的和合一味、互摄互融,即从“无住”转到“圆融”。在这种误读过程中,禅宗逐渐丧失了般若原有的绝对超越理想,并在晚期最终融入华夏的自然思维传统,它的发展也因而进入了死胡同。
般若學是禪宗的重要思想基礎,但是在如來藏彿學以及崇尚自然、固守噹下的華夏精神揹景下,禪宗不自覺地對般若思想產生瞭一些誤讀:禪宗先是將般若的即色即空理解為即色即心,併在此基礎上形成瞭即事而真的思想,然後又進一步將般若的性相不二理解為理事圓融,這兩處誤讀決定瞭禪宗思想的本體論基礎;與此相應,晚期禪宗的脩道論也逐漸把般若的真俗平等理解為彿法現成。于是,禪宗的立場就從般若的色空、性相、真俗的雙非雙遣,不自覺地轉移到理事的和閤一味、互攝互融,即從“無住”轉到“圓融”。在這種誤讀過程中,禪宗逐漸喪失瞭般若原有的絕對超越理想,併在晚期最終融入華夏的自然思維傳統,它的髮展也因而進入瞭死鬍同。
반약학시선종적중요사상기출,단시재여래장불학이급숭상자연、고수당하적화하정신배경하,선종불자각지대반약사상산생료일사오독:선종선시장반약적즉색즉공리해위즉색즉심,병재차기출상형성료즉사이진적사상,연후우진일보장반약적성상불이리해위리사원융,저량처오독결정료선종사상적본체론기출;여차상응,만기선종적수도론야축점파반약적진속평등리해위불법현성。우시,선종적립장취종반약적색공、성상、진속적쌍비쌍견,불자각지전이도리사적화합일미、호섭호융,즉종“무주”전도“원융”。재저충오독과정중,선종축점상실료반약원유적절대초월이상,병재만기최종융입화하적자연사유전통,타적발전야인이진입료사호동。
Prajna thought is an essential resource of Chan Buddhism. However, under the influences of the Buddhist Tathagata-garbha theory and Chinese traditional thinking, Chan misinterpreted Prajna thought in several aspects: Firstly, Chan interpreted "rupa(matter) is sunyata(emptiness)" of Prajna as "rupa is mind" under the influence of the Tathagata-garbha theory, then transformed it into "shi(phenomenon) is all true" in the context of the traditional natural thinking. Secondly, owing to the harmonious and integral spirit of Chinese culture, Chan interpreted "advaya(non-two) of dharma and dharmata" as "li shi yuanrong(melting together of phenomenon and noumenon)". Finally, in accordance with the above developments, Chan understood "sama(equality) of the secular with the religious, and men with Buddha" as "dharma already here". So the Chan Buddhism eventually succumbed to the natural spirit of Chinese tradition, and lost the absolute transcendence of Prajna thought.